Data-driven sequential decision making in marketing and healthcare can benefit from observations collected in related environments, particularly when data in the environment of interest are limited. Transferring such information requires accounting for differences in rewards and transition dynamics across environments. We study knowledge transfer for offline reinforcement learning through a joint estimation framework that directly integrates source information into target value-function learning. We propose Direct Transfer Fitted Q-Iteration (DFQI), which updates the target Q-function while simultaneously borrowing the source information through an L1 penalty that links the target coefficients to a weighted aggregate of source coefficients, with both determined jointly within each Bellman update. Using sieve approximation, we establish statistical guarantees for target estimation and policy learning in stationary discounted environments with common or heterogeneous transition kernels. Empirical studies further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed DFQI framework in transferring source information to improve policy learning with limited target data.
Wentao Zhang, Yilei Zhao, Guangyan Gan, Shuo Sun, Lin William Cong
原文摘要
Public disclosure repositories such as SEC EDGAR support informed investment through web access to corporate filings. Supporting their review with language model agents requires discovering unstated deficiencies across related documents, acquiring missing company facts, and verifying that requested revisions satisfy evidence-backed requirements. Existing financial question-answering evaluations provide limited evidence of these interactive capabilities. We introduce \textbf{FilingLoop}, an interactive benchmark and a self-evolving agent framework for corporate disclosure review and revision. Grounded in historical U.S.\ Securities and Exchange Commission correspondence, FilingLoop reconstructs 380 predominantly IPO review tasks from 96 companies under distinct information constraints. An evaluator separate from the acting agents scores final filings and responses against 6,099 eligible requirements and audits unsupported claims and harmful revisions. Our framework couples iterative review and revision within each case with procedural learning across cases, converting requirement-level evaluation feedback into role-specific guidance without updating model weights. Updates affect only subsequent cases, allowing procedural adaptation to be assessed without retrying scored tasks. On the evaluated stream, evolution increases requirement fulfillment from 24.28\% to 27.96\% and full comment resolution from 16.90\% to 20.75\%, with a 5.8\% increase in total cost over the fixed-policy variant. FilingLoop connects the concerns an agent discovers with the company facts it obtains and the revisions it commits, providing requirement-level feedback for procedures used in later review tasks.