跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2471新增论文
+2025其中 AI 相关
+163已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 03:54 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 15:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 04:23 — 2026-11-11 04:23(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 03:54最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 15:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-10 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,643 已收录论文17,531 AI 相关5,643 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 03:53(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10632

Latent-WAM++: Shaping World and Action Representations for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Yichen Zhang, Yupeng Zheng, Linbo Wang, Pengxuan Yang, Zebin Xing, Junli Wang, Shiwei Li, Kangwei Liu 等 13 位作者

原文摘要

We introduce Latent-WAM++, a representation-centered World Action Model (WAM) for end-to-end autonomous driving. Existing WAMs are primarily trained to predict future states or final actions, leaving the intermediate world and action representations that connect prediction to planning only indirectly constrained. Latent-WAM++ matches the supervision of each representation to its role in planning. World Representation Construction combines scene-ego future prediction, SIGReg-based distribution stabilization, and frozen geometric priors to learn a temporally predictive, non-degenerate, and geometry-aware world representation without an EMA target encoder. Trajectory MeanFlow Planner directly predicts multimodal trajectory proposals while being optimized with an Improved MeanFlow velocity-space objective, enabling one-step sampling. Visual-Action Representation Alignment further aligns the resulting pre-output action features with a stop-gradient target derived from current visual semantics. Latent-WAM++ achieves state-of-the-art performance on NAVSIM v2 and under zero-shot evaluation on HUGSIM, reaching 90.1 EPDMS on NAVSIM v2 and 47.0 average RC and 30.1 average HD-Score on HUGSIM. Training the planner end to end costs 190 GPU-hours for Latent-WAM++ versus 1,600 for Latent-WAM, a reduction of 88.1%.

cs.CV