跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 00:53 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 01:41 — 2026-11-13 01:41(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 00:53最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 00:50(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2607.01571

Geometric Signatures of Reasoning: A Spectral Perspective on Task Hardness

Aria Masoomi, Mahsa Bazzaz, Adel Javanmard, Vahab Mirrokni

原文摘要

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning enables large language models (LLMs) to solve complex problems by generating intermediate reasoning steps. While much attention has been paid to the length and content of these reasoning chains, far less is known about their internal geometry. We study the geometry of CoT trajectories in the hidden state space of transformer models, formalizing each reasoning chain as a discrete curve in $\mathbb{R}^d$ and characterizing it through spectral, positional, and kinematic geometric functionals. We introduce the effective dimension $d_ρ$ as a measure of trajectory complexity and empirically show that harder tasks exhibit greater effective dimension. Lastly, we explore how kinematic features of the trajectory, mean position, positional dispersion, initial and final hidden states, mean velocity, mean speed, and speed dispersion, can be used to predict solution correctness before generation is complete, and may inform future early-stopping strategies. Experimentally, on 86 mathematical reasoning problems from the MATH500 dataset and three Qwen2.5 model scales (0.5B, 1.5B, and 7B), $d_ρ$ achieves difficulty-prediction AUROC of $0.90$, $0.94$, and $0.96$, respectively. Seven kinematic and positional features predict correctness from only the first $20\%$ of generated tokens, with AUROC between $0.77$ and $0.88$ across scales. These correctness signatures transfer across held-out questions, establishing that the shape of a model's internal reasoning trajectory is a principled window into both task hardness and solution quality.

cs.LG