跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 18:02 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 18:52 — 2026-11-15 18:52(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 18:02最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 18:01(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2609.05762

AAMBERS-UAV: Acquisition-Aware Multimodal Backbone Evaluation and Ranking for UAV Weedy Rice Segmentation

Tarek Rahman, Nazim-E-Alam, Md Kishor Morol, Jannatun Noor

原文摘要

UAV image collections contain spatially and temporally related frames, yet semantic-segmentation benchmarks commonly split them at image level. Such splitting can place samples from one acquisition in both model development and testing, obscuring transfer to a genuinely new survey. Using the 734-sample WeedyRice-RGBMS-DB, we fix a 124-image target-acquisition test set and compare two protocols with identical train, validation, and test counts: target-held-out, which excludes the target acquisition from development, and target-exposed, which admits its remaining images. SegFormer-B0 is evaluated with RGB, four-band multispectral (MS), and seven-channel RGB+MS input over two fixed-split seeds. RGB is strongest under complete acquisition holdout ($0.7317\pm0.0201$ IoU), whereas RGB+MS becomes strongest after target exposure ($0.7822\pm0.0269$). A fixed-split U-Net/ResNet18 replication confirms positive exposure gains for all three inputs, but retains RGB as the best modality under both protocols. Acquisition exposure therefore increases measured performance across both evaluated backbones, while its effect on modality ranking is architecture-dependent. A supplied-split audit reveals strong near-sequential dependence, and corruption tests show that early fusion is substantially more sensitive to RGB--MS displacement than to moderate radiometric scaling. These results support acquisition-aware same-test evaluation as a necessary complement to ordinary image-level splitting in multimodal UAV benchmarks. The code and supporting the findings of this study will be publicly released upon acceptance of the paper.

cs.CV · cs.LG

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2611.02119

Testing concept-level audits of melanoma classifiers with diffusion counterfactuals and matched positive controls

Md Shohanoor Rahman, Md Hasibul Islam, Md Kishor Morol, Dip Nandi, Tze Hui Liew

原文摘要

Concept-based explanations of melanoma classifiers are rarely tested against controls with known targets. We built a counterfactual audit from a diffusion model conditioned on seven 7-point checklist concepts and tested it with such controls. Colour-calibrated start noise reduced colour outliers from 78.5-84.8\% to 6.6-13.3\%. Four of seven knobs were target-dominant but also changed other concepts. Quartile-based positive controls were confounded, and the audit failed its pre-specified rule. It recovered the targets of all 16 controls matched on the generator's pseudo-labels and of 12 of 12 controls labelled by a second evaluator, for three concepts; concept activation vectors recovered fewer (11 of 16). In 18 permuted-label classifiers, significant sweep responses and target rankings also arose, whereas standardised effect margins separated the controls from these null classifiers. The pigmentation sweep raised the melanoma logit in 15 of 15 ISIC 2020 classifiers (+3.12 on average) and 6 of 6 HAM10000 classifiers (+4.01), about four times the null response in scale-free units; the regression effect did not transfer. An exploratory decomposition, evaluated against the controls, suggested that knob cross-talk partly hides vascular responses. Matched controls and null classifiers are practical checks of concept audits.

cs.CV · cs.AI · cs.LG

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02603

BGD-SF PolySegNet: boundary-guided dynamic selective fusion network for robust polyp segmentation in colonoscopy images

Nishi Kanta Paul, Shamia Maherin, Morsheda Akter, Moinul Hossain, Md Kishor Morol

原文摘要

Effective polyp segmentation in colonoscopy images is crucial for early detection of colorectal cancer, a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. While current deep learning models perform well on traditional Dice benchmarks, border segmentation remains difficult. Most methods use boundary information only as an additional loss signal during training, which prevents the network from explicitly learning border-guided feature selection or mask refinement. This paper introduces BGD-SF PolySegNet, a boundary-guided encoder-decoder architecture that controls three phases of the segmentation pipeline: dynamic multi-scale context aggregation, selective skip-feature fusion, and final mask refinement. The architecture comprises a pretrained EfficientNet-B4 backbone and three proposed modules: Boundary-Guided Dynamic Cascaded Multi-Scale Context Aggregation (BGD-CMSCA), Boundary-Guided Selective Attention Fusion (BG-SAGF), and a Multi-Level Boundary Guidance Head (MBGH). The model is trained on 3,535 annotated images from Kvasir-SEG, BKAI-IGH NeoPolyp-Small, and PolypGen, and evaluated on four held-out benchmark datasets. On the internal test set, BGD-SF achieves a Dice of 0.887, IoU of 0.839, mask-derived Boundary F1 of 0.531, HD95 of 30.32, and ASSD of 18.10, improving Boundary F1, HD95, and ASSD by 15.7%, 27.5%, and 34.6% over the strongest CNN baselines. External validation on CVC-ClinicDB, CVC-ColonDB, ETIS-Larib, and CVC-300 yielded Dice scores of 0.891, 0.776, 0.863, and 0.885, respectively. The model runs at 35 FPS with 22.51M parameters. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirm statistically significant mask-derived Boundary F1 improvements over six of seven ablation variants (p < 0.001; small-to-moderate effect sizes, r = 0.215-0.434), demonstrating that integrating boundary guidance as an active architectural component measurably advances polyp boundary delineation.

cs.CV