Pole or Vector? Encoders Capture Bangla Compound Verbs, but LLMs Read Them Literally
Md. Asaduzzaman Shuvo, Md Mehrab Karim Antor, Md. Adnanul Islam, Shahanur Rahman Bappy, Sajid Ahamed, Mahfuz Hasan Reza, Md Delwar Shahadat Deepu
原文摘要
In Bangla, a main verb is often followed by one of a small set of vector verbs. These verbs lose their own meaning and add a shade of meaning instead, such as completion. For example, likhe phello means that someone finished writing, not that they wrote and threw something. The same two verbs can also describe two separate events, so only the context shows which meaning is meant. This makes compound verbs a hard test of how language models handle multiword expressions. We present BanglaCV-Probe, a benchmark of 17 vector verbs with 1,044 minimal pairs, 204 entailment items and 197 pairs of correct and incorrect combinations, all checked by native speakers. We test 26 models (encoders, LLMs and translation systems) on four skills: telling the two meanings apart internally, understanding what a vector adds, preferring correct combinations and keeping the vector's meaning in translation. Probes on five encoders tell the two meanings apart and still reach up to 93% accuracy when trained on pairs without surface cues. Prompted models rarely use this knowledge. Entailment accuracy stays between 59% and 81%. Several LLMs answer Yes or No to almost every item, and nine of ten models miss that someone who ate up the rice left none. Most instruction-tuned LLMs translate vectors literally in 15-20% of vector sentences and in up to 55% for mora (die). On correct combinations, a small Bangla-only model (88%) matches BLOOM-7B1 (87%) and both beat Qwen2.5-7B (74%). Data and code: https://github.com/ashuvo25/Pole_OR_Vector
cs.CL