跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1673新增论文
+1257其中 AI 相关
+198已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 22:39 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 20:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 23:13 — 2026-11-13 23:13(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 22:39最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 20:44库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,727 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 22:37(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16661

Reducing Batch Makespan for LLM Agent Workloads through Inference-Environment Coordination

Wei Feng, Meiling Chen, Boxiao Chen, Lu Liu, Bin Zi, Libin Ye, Xingyu Lu, Lei Xu 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Efficient batch execution of agent tasks is critical to LLM training and development workflows, including benchmark evaluation, synthetic-data generation, and RL rollouts. Since these tasks alternate between LLM inference and environment interaction, we present coordinated optimizations to reduce batch makespan, the time required to complete all tasks in a batch. For hybrid LLMs, a workload-based resource model guides GPU-memory allocation between key-value (KV) cache and recurrent state and provides a reference sample concurrency to exploit parallelism while limiting recomputation. Trajectory-aware routing and scheduling promote cache reuse while balancing worker load. Under constrained environment capacity, we decouple sample admission from environment execution and introduce Chain-Advancing Action Scheduling (CAAS), which prioritizes long chains using observed progress to shorten the batch tail. Controlled replay combines actual inference with recorded environment responses and durations for ablations of individual optimizations. Live evaluations with Ling-3.0-Flash and Ling-3.1-Flash on the BFCL, SWE-bench Multilingual, WideSearch, and MCP-Atlas benchmarks demonstrate makespan reductions of 10.4% to 65.0%, while evaluation scores remain aligned. Furthermore, these methods have been successfully applied to training and evaluation workflows for the Ling-3.x model series, accelerating the model-development cycle.

cs.DC · cs.AI