跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 02:57 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 03:12 — 2026-11-10 03:12(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 02:57最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 02:55(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09476

LEMMO: A Large Electromagnetic Model leveraging Pretrained LLMs for Million-Sample Signal Understanding

Mingkai Li, Jiajun Wu, Yihan Mao, Zilin Sang, Taosong Yu, Yuan Ma, Minghe Liu, Qianqian Yang 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Large language models have expanded beyond text to vision, audio, and other modalities, but understanding raw electromagnetic (EM) signals remains challenging. Wideband recordings can contain millions of samples, whereas existing waveform-based EM models are primarily evaluated on short in-phase and quadrature (IQ) segments, leaving long-recording understanding and detailed description insufficiently explored. We introduce LEMMO, a large EM model for instruction-driven recognition and description of long raw IQ recordings. LEMMO combines a linear-attention EM encoder with anti-aliased temporal resampling to process up to eight million complex samples. Its EM-text interaction module conditions learnable queries on instructions before retrieving signal evidence. Compact queries support recognition, while structured queries with auxiliary factual supervision organize scene-level properties, signal attributes, and cross-signal relationships for detailed description. We also construct and release a unified 1.38-TB corpus of real-world and synthetic EM signals, including LEMMO-ShortQA and LEMMO-LongDesc. Compared with MERLIN-LoRA, LEMMO improves mean EM-Bench perception accuracy by 15.77 %, mean strategy-generation ROUGE-L F1 by 4.38 points, and mean LEMMO-ShortQA accuracy by 14.31 %. It also improves categorical and numerical fact F1 on both LEMMO-LongDesc tasks while preserving its language backbone's MMLU performance. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/N1rv4n4/LEMMO and https://huggingface.co/datasets/DaftJun/RFLAS, respectively.

cs.AI · cs.SD

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.37196

How Much Can Best-of-N Help a World Action Model? Measuring Selectable Headroom and Realizing It in Closed Loop

Haojia Gao, Yue Cao, Yumin Liu, Haohua Que, Mingkai Liu, Guanqiu Guo, Zhuo Zou, Bokui Chen 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

World action models (WAMs) predict the visual consequences of the actions they generate, which makes test-time selection a natural way to improve a fixed policy: imagine the futures of candidate actions and execute the best one. The benefit of selection is bounded by the selectable headroom, how much better the best candidate truly is, but the standard estimate, which executes each candidate once and keeps the best outcome, conflates candidate quality with the randomness of everything that follows. We introduce a denoised counterfactual protocol, based on bitwise-reproducible branching, repeated continuations, held-out oracles, and common random numbers, that measures the headroom a selector can realize, and use its measurements to build a fail-gated selector. Across four WAMs, two benchmarks, over 100,000 branched rollouts, and pre-registered tests, we find that (i) the standard estimate overstates the selectable headroom of native samples: bounds from 17 continuations per candidate place its selectable share between 24% and 66% for three WAMs; (ii) structured action perturbations create up to 16 points of selectable headroom; and (iii) in both WAMs with action-conditioned imagination, imagined futures carry candidate-outcome information with no detectable loss relative to real futures, information that the value head of Cosmos Policy leaves unused. Deviating from the policy chunk only when a readout of the WAM predicts failure, the selector raises closed-loop task success from 76.9% to 81.6% on held-out episodes of training tasks, with the largest gain where the policy fails most often, and from 62.6% to 69.8% on unseen tasks.

cs.RO · cs.CV · cs.LG