跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 02:57 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 03:39 — 2026-11-13 03:39(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 02:57最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 02:56(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12374

TANSAR: Editable and Attributable Correlation Matrix Memories under Correlated Keys, with Rule-Constrained Multi-Hop Knowledge Editing

Abdulhady Abas Abdulla, Jiyan Salim Mahmud, Fatemeh Daneshfar, Hussein Mohammed Ali, Mourad Oussalah, Muhammad Bilal

原文摘要

Correlation Matrix Memories (CMMs) store associations as sums of rank-one outer products, providing closed-form addressability, exact deletion, and linear attribution. While classical analyses assume random, orthogonal keys, semantic encoders produce correlated representations. We analyse CMMs under correlated keys using frame-theoretic coherence: (i) capacity bounds yielding an encoder-independent limit $n \le d(1+\varepsilon^2)$ for mean squared crosstalk $\varepsilon^2$; (ii) an exact characterisation of the collateral effect of deleting an association, guaranteeing that deletion never invalidates certified associations; and (iii) a geometric transparency bound demonstrating why attribution requires candidate sets of centred keys. On this basis, we introduce Topology-Aware Neuro-Symbolic Associative Retrieval (TANSAR). TANSAR traverses a directed acyclic association graph, prunes invalid paths via sound ground Horn constraints, and injects a representation derived strictly from the verified path into the residual stream of a frozen language model, guarded by a Clopper--Pearson selective-risk gate. Controlled experiments confirm all theoretical bounds. In multi-hop knowledge editing, Horn pruning reduces answer contradictions from 25.1% to 0.5%, whereas Hopfield retrieval incurs 24% contradictions when stale associations remain stored (and 0% if stale associations are removed). An end-to-end edit transaction requires 13.6 ms on a standard CPU and 2.37 ms on GPU. The symbolic component matches gold labels across all 600 ProofWriter theories and achieves 94.0% agreement on FOLIO, demonstrating sound and efficient multi-hop associative retrieval with exact unlearning.

cs.AI

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.153ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

BracketRank: Large Language Model Document Ranking via Reasoning-based Competitive Elimination

Abdelrahman Abdallah, Mohammed Ali, Bhawna Piryani Universität Innsbruck, Adam Jatowt

原文摘要

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) show strong potential for zero-shot document ranking, current listwise approaches face three critical limitations. First, context length constraints prevent processing many documents simultaneously. Second, sequential generation creates bottlenecks that cannot run in parallel. Third, ranking results depend heavily on initial document order, leading to inconsistent performance. We introduce BracketRank, a reasoning-driven competitive elimination framework that addresses these challenges through systematic group competition. Our method uses adaptive grouping to automatically optimise group sizes based on LLM context limits, reasoning-enhanced prompts that require explicit relevance explanations, and bracket-style elimination where documents compete through winner and loser brackets. This structure ensures every document has fair advancement opportunities regardless of initial positioning while allowing for parallel processing across competition stages. We evaluate BracketRank on TREC DL 19, TREC DL 20, and eight BEIR benchmark datasets. Results show that BracketRank achieves 77.90 NDCG@5 on TREC DL 19 and 75.85 NDCG@5 on TREC DL 20, outperforming RankGPT and other state-of-the-art methods. On BEIR datasets, BracketRank reaches 54.66 average NDCG@10, demonstrating robust performance across diverse domains.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表