跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1030新增论文
+790其中 AI 相关
+128已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 00:46 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 22:47各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 01:22 — 2026-11-12 01:22(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 00:46最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 22:47库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,673 已收录论文18,321 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 00:43(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.13135

Which Successes Make Good References? Action-Sequence Alignment for Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation

Mufei Li, Nikki Lijing Kuang, Zhuoer Wang, Samson Koelle, Jie Yuan, Manqing Mao, Hong Wang, Yanjun Lin 等 12 位作者

原文摘要

On-policy distillation (OPD) reduces train-inference distribution mismatch by supervising a student on its own trajectories. For multi-turn tool-use agents, conditioning the teacher on a validated same-task successful trajectory as a reference can provide useful hindsight, but different successes may reach incompatible interaction states and offer misleading supervision. We cast successful-reference selection as a free-target optimal transport problem, which reduces to assigning each failed trajectory its most compatible successful reference. Because latent state paths are hidden, we use action-sequence alignment as an observable proxy for compatibility and instantiate it with longest common subsequence (LCS), which identifies a shared ordered backbone of actions while allowing recoverable detours. This perspective makes trajectory compatibility the central criterion for reference selection in multi-turn OPD. Experiments on ALFWorld and the airline domain of $τ^3$-bench show that LCS is the only evaluated reference selector to improve over reference-free OPD on both ALFWorld overall scores and all three airline metrics. Without further optimization, the airline-trained models also transfer to the retail domain, where LCS improves all three metrics.

cs.LG · cs.AI · cs.CL

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05596

RAGCompass: Generalizable Retriever Routing via Reranking

Valentin Six, Mufei Li, Dongqi Fu, Yinglong Xia, Hong Li, Pan Li

原文摘要

Different retrievers exist for retrieval-augmented generation, yet none performs best for all queries. Therefore, the key question is: given a query and retrieved passages from different retrievers, which one is most suited for that query? Existing routers usually make predictions from query-specific features and a fixed pool of retrievers; such routers have no output for an unseen retriever and are incapable by design on a new corpus. To fill these gaps, RAGCompass reads the retrieved passage sets themselves: passages from an unfamiliar retriever or corpus stay directly comparable to other passages, so routing stays well designed where a query-only map would fail. We contrastively fine-tune a reranker against the answer each evidence set produces, which accounts for most of the gain; a small comparison head adds a moderate improvement, and neither component has retriever-specific parameters. RAGCompass improves answer F1 by 28% relative to the best fixed retriever, and outperforms fusion baselines, three query-only routers, and a prompted 8B language model. Generalization experiments show that RAGCompass keeps most of its gain under an unseen corpus, retriever, or reader, while query-only baselines fall to the best fixed retriever or below.

cs.CL · cs.IR