跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 02:35 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 02:38 — 2026-11-15 02:38(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 02:35最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 02:34(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2512.24078

高维遗憾最小化

High-dimensional Regret Minimization

Junyu Liao, Ashwin Lall, Mitsunori Ogihara, Raymond Wong

AI 速读 基于摘要

提出 FHDR 框架,利用稀疏线性偏好,通过轻量交互在高维数据上快速发现关键属性,从而降低交互式遗憾最小化的交互轮数与执行时间。

cs.DB · cs.CG · cs.IR

查看原文摘要

Multi-criteria decision making over large databases is fundamental to many real-world applications. Interactive regret minimization has emerged recently as a promising approach that combines the controllable output size of top-$k$ queries with the flexibility of skyline queries, without requiring users to explicitly specify a utility function. Instead, the system iteratively presents a small set of options, learns the user's implicit preferences from their selections, and progressively refines its recommendations. However, modern applications such as housing search and financial product selection often involve hundreds of attributes. Existing interactive methods either fail to scale to such high-dimensional data or require excessive user interaction, frequently exceeding $1000$ rounds. We address this limitation with FHDR (Fast High-Dimensional Reduction), a framework that exploits sparse linear preferences to discover key attributes through lightweight interactions. We also propose AttributeSubset, an efficient single-round algorithm that returns a compact recommendation set without further feedback. In our experiments on real datasets, FHDR completes in under $0.03$s and requires fewer than $30$ interaction rounds under the default setting. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets show that FHDR outperforms the best-known baselines by at least one order of magnitude in execution time and by up to several orders of magnitude in interaction cost. These results establish FHDR as a new state of the art for scalable interactive regret minimization.

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2604.23018

AmaraSpatial-10K: A Spatially and Semantically Aligned 3D Dataset for Spatial Computing and Embodied AI

Mohammad Sadegh Salehi, Alexander J. P. Perkins, Igor Pardo Maurell, Ashkan Dabbagh, Raymond Wong

原文摘要

Web-scale 3D asset collections are abundant but rarely ready to ingest without cleanup, suffering from arbitrary metric scaling, incorrect pivots, brittle geometry, and incomplete textures, defects that limit their use in embodied AI, robotics, and spatial computing. We present AmaraSpatial-10K, a dataset of 10,071 synthetic 3D assets standardised for direct ingestion. Each asset ships as a metric-scaled, deterministically anchored .glb with separated PBR maps, a convex collision hull, a paired reference image, and multi-sentence text metadata. Alongside the dataset we introduce a reusable evaluation suite for 3D asset banks, a continuous Scale Plausibility Score (SPS), a keyword-based Concept Density metric, anchor-error auditing, and a cross-modal CLIP coherence protocol, and apply it to AmaraSpatial-10K alongside matched subsets of Objaverse, HSSD, ABO, and GSO. We check the annotations independently of the LLM/VLM pipeline that produced them: measured ABO object heights fall inside our scale intervals 88.7-90.7% of the time, and three non-author raters auditing a stratified sample of 314 assets judge 95.5% plausibly scaled and 99.7% correctly anchored. AmaraSpatial-10K improves CLIP Recall@5 by 3.4x over Objaverse (0.612 vs. 0.181, median rank 267 -> 3), achieves a 99.1% settling-stability rate under Habitat-Sim in static placement and collision tests, with ~20x lower per-load wall time, and as a drop-in Holodeck asset bank improves planned-scale matching and is preferred by blinded human raters in 27 of 40 paired scenes. Controlled ablations on the same asset bank attribute the retrieval gain to description richness.

cs.CV · cs.AI · cs.LG