跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 06:50 — 2026-11-16 06:50(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05690

Turbocharging PiPNN for Proximity and $k$-NN Graph Building

Tobias Rubel, Richard Wen, Guy Blelloch, Laxman Dhulipala, Lars Gottesbüren, Jakub Łącki, Vahab Mirrokni

原文摘要

Graph-based Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search (ANNS) indexes such as HNSW and Vamana deliver state-of-the-art query performance at the cost of large indexing times. The recently introduced PiPNN method drastically accelerated index construction by way of a partitioning-based algorithm leveraging dense matrix multiplication and top-$K$ aggregation kernels. In this paper, we unlock the full potential of PiPNN's hardware-friendly algorithm design. We introduce PiPNN II, which optimizes multiple steps of the PiPNN recipe, giving up to $8\times$ speedups for graph-based ANNS index construction. In addition, we present GPiPNN, a GPU implementation which builds comparable ANNS indices up to $43.7\times$ faster than Jasper and up to $50\times$ faster than CAGRA. We also extend PiPNN II and GPiPNN to compute high-quality $k$-NN graphs directly, which unlocks massive speedups over methods used in many existing systems for clustering, anomaly detection, and more. For 10-NN graph building at $90\%$ recall, we obtain up to a $13\times$ speedup on CPUs and $6.6\times$ on GPUs as compared to the prior best methods. PiPNN II can build a billion-scale 10-NN graph in under 16 minutes. Common to both PiPNN II and GPiPNN is the use of quantization to reduce memory traffic and leverage fast low-precision matrix operations. Top-$K$ emerges as a new bottleneck, which we optimize with specialized code for specific $K$, and by fusing with the matrix kernel to avoid materializing the distance matrix to memory. On CPUs, we demonstrate further performance improvements by leveraging our matrix kernels in the RobustPrune procedure proposed in Vamana and used in PiPNN. On GPUs, we flatten recursive partitioning into segmented batches, use one fused top-$K$ abstraction for partitioning and leaf scoring, and prune with already-witnessed direct edges rather than new candidate-to-candidate scoring passes.

cs.DB · cs.IR