跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 07:45 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 08:41 — 2026-11-15 08:41(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 07:45最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 07:44(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11627

Attack Injection to Vehicle Reactions: Extensible Closed-Loop Adversarial Evaluation Framework

Mohamed Gaber, Tahsin Wahid, Mohammad Mamun, Salimur Choudhury

原文摘要

Autonomous vehicles can use information exchanged with other vehicles and roadside infrastructure to support driving decisions. However, applications that rely on this information can make unsafe decisions when it is falsified. Studying the resulting traffic effects requires following received information through application decisions, vehicle reactions, and subsequent interactions. We present an extensible closed-loop adversarial evaluation framework built on VaN3Twin, a platform for traffic and wireless network simulation, with a diverse attack library and a labelled dataset covering benign and attack conditions. A key advantage of the framework is that it can be extended with additional attacks, message paths, receiving applications, and logging fields. The added library contains 76 configurable attack profiles adapted to message formats defined by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute. These profiles are organized into nine groups of related attacks, referred to as suites. The framework connects live attack injection and simulated network delivery to receiving applications, whose selected commands update vehicle movement. The resulting state feeds subsequent message generation, closing the loop. The dataset links physical vehicle states and message exchanges to attack labels, application decisions, selected commands, and traffic outcomes. Evaluation with individual and combined attack suites confirmed execution of all profiles, and every suite produced requests linked to attacked messages. A recorded sequence also showed a vehicle reacting to an attacked message and subsequently influencing another vehicle through an unmodified message describing its updated movement. These findings demonstrate how live injection and vehicle feedback support the study of direct and indirect effects as traffic evolves.

cs.CR · cs.NI

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.07982

How Far Can Lightweight LLMs Go in Intent-to-SLO Translation?

Sabbir Ahmed, Hazem Abbas, Salimur Choudhury

原文摘要

Intent-based networking (IBN) promises QoS provisioning in which the network derives the configuration from operator-stated goals. Its first step, translating a natural-language intent into enforceable service-level objectives (SLOs) grounded in a live snapshot of the network state, increasingly relies on large language models (LLMs). These large models add cost and energy to the management loop and typically require multi-GPU, cloud-hosted infrastructure. Can lightweight open LLMs take over this step dependably? We answer this question with a five-dimensional evaluation of ten LLMs with <10B parameters from five families, under four prompting setups, on 716 placement intents. We evaluate translation performance, intent validation, hallucination, energy impact, and robustness to diverse phrasing. The best configurations translate intents with a strict F1 of 0.943 and reject up to 191 of 195 invalid intents. With few-shot reasoning, the strongest models hallucinate unsupported QoS requirements in only about one response in a hundred, whereas the zero-shot setup struggles. A translated intent costs 0.044-0.148 Wh of GPU energy without reasoning, and added energy cost for reasoning pays off for the weaker models. Furthermore, we show that realistic rephrasing lowers the rejection of invalid intents in 15 of 16 configurations for the best-performing models, leaving robust intent validation as a key open challenge for reliable IBN. Our code and data are available: https://github.com/ggck43/intent2slo.

cs.NI · cs.CL