跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 05:05 — 2026-11-16 05:05(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10046

Topological Deep Learning Challenge 2026: Bridging the Gap

Guillermo Bernárdez, Lev Telyatnikov, Mathilde Papillon, Marco Montagna, Louisa Cornelis, Louis Van Langendonck, Antonio Purificato, Bruno Neri 等 71 位作者

原文摘要

This paper describes the 2026 edition of the Topological Deep Learning Challenge: Bridging the Gap, hosted at the second Topology, Algebra, and Geometry in Data Science (TAG-DS) Conference. Where previous editions grew the modelling and data ecosystem of Topological Deep Learning (TDL), this edition set out to place Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Topological Neural Networks (TNNs) side by side under a single evaluation pipeline. Participants implemented recent state-of-the-art architectures in TopoBench, with Track 1 covering GNNs and Track 2 covering TNNs. They evaluated these implementations on shared synthetic benchmarks generated with GraphUniverse, which independently controls homophily, average degree and degree-distribution heaviness. The challenge yielded 68 qualifying submissions from 34 teams, spanning the graph, simplicial, cellular, hypergraph and combinatorial domains. For the first time, submissions were also tracked on a public leaderboard, which we summarize and analyze here. Our analysis finds that the differences between the submitted tracks are strongly task-dependent: the mean accuracy gap is modest on community detection, while on triangle counting the Track 1 mean error is 1.85 times the Track 2 mean. Several structurally informed GNNs also outperform the Track 2 mean on triangle counting.

cs.LG · cs.AI

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2510.12975

A Connection Between Score Matching and Local Intrinsic Dimension

Eric Yeats, Aaron Jacobson, Darryl Hannan, Yiran Jia, Timothy Doster, Henry Kvinge, Scott Mahan

原文摘要

The local intrinsic dimension (LID) of data is a fundamental quantity in signal processing and learning theory, but quantifying the LID of high-dimensional, complex data has been a historically challenging task. Recent works have discovered that diffusion models capture the LID of data through the spectra of their score estimates and through the rate of change of their density estimates under various noise perturbations. While these methods can accurately quantify LID, they require either many forward passes of the diffusion model or use of gradient computation, limiting their applicability in compute- and memory-constrained scenarios. We show that the LID is a lower bound on the denoising score matching loss, motivating use of the denoising score matching loss as a LID estimator. Moreover, we show that the equivalent implicit score matching loss also approximates LID via the normal dimension and is closely related to a recent LID estimator, FLIPD. Our experiments on a manifold benchmark and with Stable Diffusion 3.5 indicate that the denoising score matching loss is a highly competitive and scalable LID estimator, achieving superior accuracy and memory footprint under increasing problem size and quantization level.

cs.LG · stat.ML