跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1673新增论文
+1257其中 AI 相关
+197已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 19:28 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 14:16各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 19:53 — 2026-11-13 19:53(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 19:28最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 14:16库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,726 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 19:27(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10217

Rethinking How to Leverage Cheap Physics for Data-Efficient Neural Operators

Shuo Zhang, Senwei Liang

原文摘要

Neural operators learn mappings from PDE inputs, such as initial conditions and coefficient fields, to the corresponding solutions. Once trained, they can rapidly predict solutions for new inputs. However, obtaining input-solution pairs for supervised training often requires expensive numerical simulations, whereas PDE inputs and governing equations provide inexpensive physical information. This raises a question: how can cheap physical information reduce the need for labeled solutions? A natural approach is to use physics to select inputs for labeling, but our acquisition experiments show no consistent advantage over random sampling. This observation motivates exploring an alternative: using cheap physics to improve neural operator initialization before supervised training. We propose Physics-Informed Initialization (PI-Init), a simple yet effective method that pretrains neural operators on unlabeled inputs using physics-informed losses and retains the learned parameters for supervised fine-tuning on the labeled dataset. A linearized analysis shows that pretraining can improve downstream prediction accuracy by reducing initialization errors that limited labeled data cannot effectively correct. Experiments across diverse PDE benchmarks and neural operator architectures demonstrate improvements in predictive accuracy, out-of-distribution generalization, and label efficiency. Representative results show error reductions of up to 62.7% at the same label budget and comparable or better accuracy with 90% fewer labels, relative to supervised-only training.

cs.LG