跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1029新增论文
+789其中 AI 相关
+127已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 18:22 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 13:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 18:28 — 2026-11-11 18:28(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 18:22最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 13:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,672 已收录论文18,320 AI 相关6,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 18:20(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09240

MM-DyGraph: A Dataset, Benchmark, and Model for Multimodal Dynamic Graphs

Zongyuan Wu, Pengjie Wang, Lingshan Chen, Tianhang Wan, Yuan Meng, Xin Wang, Ling Feng, Wenwu Zhu

原文摘要

Multimodal dynamic graphs are pervasive in real-world applications, where nodes and edges are accompanied by multimodal signals, including text and images. Despite their practical importance, benchmarks and methods that explicitly study multimodal learning in dynamic graphs remain scarce, hindering the full understanding and effective utilization of multimodal information for downstream tasks. To address this gap, we introduce MM-DyGraph, to the best of our knowledge, the first benchmark for multimodal dynamic graph learning, consisting of diverse real-world datasets with fine-grained temporal graph evolution and rich multimodal attributes. MM-DyGraph provides three evaluation tasks to comprehensively assess model performance in dynamic settings. We benchmark representative state-of-the-art dynamic graph methods and reveal that naive feature concatenation yields target-level inconsistencies: multimodal inputs benefit certain prediction targets while harming others. This observation indicates that the modality informativeness depends on the specific prediction target over time. Building on these observations, we propose a Target-aware Spatial-Temporal Multimodal Fusion (TST-MF) framework, which jointly conditions multimodal fusion on the prediction target and spatial-temporal relations, enabling context-adaptive cross-modal interplay for target-specific representations. Extensive experiments over diverse datasets and tasks show that TST-MF delivers robust and competitive performance, achieving clear gains in multimodal settings.

cs.AI · cs.LG

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2511.16660

推理的认知基础及其在大语言模型中的表现

Cognitive Foundations for Reasoning and Their Manifestation in LLMs

Shuyue Stella Li, Priyanka Kargupta, Haocheng Wang, Jinu Lee, Dean Light, Shan Chen, Orevaoghene Ahia, Thomas L. Griffiths 等 12 位作者

AI 速读 基于摘要

该研究将认知科学整合为28个认知要素的分类体系,并据此细粒度比较18个模型与人类在推理过程中的认知要素使用差异。

cs.AI

查看原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) solve complex problems yet fail on simpler variants, suggesting they achieve correct outputs through mechanisms fundamentally different from human reasoning. To understand this gap, we synthesize cognitive science research into a taxonomy of 28 cognitive elements spanning reasoning invariants, meta-cognitive controls, representations for organizing reasoning and knowledge, and transformation operations. We introduce a fine-grained evaluation framework and apply it to 192K traces from 18 models across text, vision, and audio, alongside 1,346 human think-aloud traces on a new, domain-agnostic dataset for human-model comparison. We find that models are able to deploy cognitive elements seen in human reasoning but differ in how they use them. Leveraging these patterns, we develop test-time reasoning guidance that automatically scaffolds successful reasoning topologies, improving the accuracy of the strongest models by 9.7 percentage points on ill-structured problems. Meta-analysis of 1.6K LLM reasoning papers reveals the research community concentrates on easily quantifiable elements but rarely targets self-awareness, whose use differs between human and model reasoning. By establishing a shared vocabulary between cognitive science and LLM research, our framework enables diagnosis of reasoning failures and principled development of models that reason through robust cognitive mechanisms rather than spurious shortcuts, while providing tools to test theories of human cognition at scale.