跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+3203新增论文
+2404其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+33新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-04 23:44 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-04 23:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 00:09 — 2026-11-05 00:09(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-04 23:44最近发现新增版本:2026-11-04 23:44库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

11,880 已收录论文10,079 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-04 23:39(北京时间)
版本更新 · v5arXiv:1805.12152Berkeley BAIR

鲁棒性可能与准确率相冲突

Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracy

Dimitris Tsipras, Shibani Santurkar, Logan Engstrom, Alexander Turner, Aleksander Madry

AI 速览:作者论证对抗鲁棒性与标准泛化之间存在内在张力,训练鲁棒模型可能导致标准准确率下降,但鲁棒模型学到的特征表示更符合人类感知。

We show that there may exist an inherent tension between the goal of adversarial robustness and that of standard generalization. Specifically, training robust models may not only be more resource-consuming, but also lead to a reduction of standard accuracy. We demonstrate that this trade-off between the standard accuracy of a model and its robustness to adversarial perturbations provably exists in a fairly simple and natural setting. These findings also corroborate a similar phenomenon observed empirically in more complex settings. Further, we argue that this phenomenon is a consequence of robust classifiers learning fundamentally different feature representations than standard classifiers. These differences, in particular, seem to result in unexpected benefits: the representations learned by robust models tend to align better with salient data characteristics and human perception.

stat.ML · cs.CV · cs.LG · cs.NE
arXiv ↗PDF ↗