跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 05:41 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 06:36 — 2026-11-15 06:36(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 05:41最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 05:40(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.19429

自动驾驶中强化学习算法的综合比较

A Comprehensive Comparison of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Autonomous Driving

Dechen Xie, Mushuang Liu

AI 速读 基于摘要

在同一无信号交叉口自动驾驶决策问题上,对FVI、RCPI、DQN和D-DDPG四种强化学习方法进行最优性、安全性、训练稳定性与成本比较。

cs.LG · eess.SY

查看原文摘要

This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of four representative Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods in autonomous vehicle (AV) decision-making, including Fitted Value Iteration (FVI), Rollout Classification Policy Iteration (RCPI), Deep Q-Network (DQN), and a discrete-action adaptation of Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (D-DDPG). The four methods are applied to the same AV decision-making problem at an unsignalized intersection and are compared in terms of optimality, safety, training stability, and training and decision cost. Observations suggest that RCPI provides the closest estimation to the exact solution and has the most stable training curve; however, it is data-intensive and requires the largest volume of data. D-DDPG is the most data-efficient one, but at the price of the training stability. Based on the observations, we provide suggestions for the algorithm selection for AV decision making.

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2605.19511

Are Watermarked Images Editable? SafeMark for Watermark-Preserving Text-Guided Image Editing

Xiaodong Wu, Qi Li, Xiangman Li, Zelin Zhang, Lingshuang Liu, Jianbing Ni

原文摘要

This paper investigates a fundamental yet underexplored question: can watermarked images remain editable without compromising watermark integrity? We propose SafeMark, a framework for watermark-preserving text-guided image manipulation that explicitly integrates watermark integrity into the editing process. Specifically, SafeMark adds a thresholded watermark-decoding loss directly to the diffusion editor's training objective, fine-tuning the editor so that semantically valid edits also preserve the embedded watermark at the final output. This design admits a clean information-theoretic justification: maintaining high bit-accuracy on the edited image lower-bounds the mutual information that the editor channel preserves between watermark and edited output, the quantity that fundamentally controls watermark recoverability. SafeMark is compatible with differentiable diffusion-based editors, and requires no architectural modification. Extensive evaluations across multiple datasets, text-guided editing methods, and post-edit distortion settings demonstrate that SafeMark achieves high watermark bit accuracy across diverse editing settings while maintaining high-quality semantic edits, without sacrificing robustness to common post-edit distortions. These results demonstrate that semantic editability and watermark integrity are fundamentally compatible, enabling trustworthy image provenance in generative editing pipelines.

cs.CV

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.718ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

LLM Agents in Law: Taxonomy, Applications, and Challenges

Shuang Liu Carnegie Mellon University, Ruijia Zhang, Ruoyun Ma ByteDance Inc., Yujia Deng Facebook, Lanyi Zhu University of Washington, Jiayu Li University of Chicago, Zelong Li Amazon, Zhibin Shen Columbia University 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) have precipitated a dramatic improvement in the legal domain, yet the deployment of standalone models faces significant limitations regarding hallucination, outdated information, and verifiability. Recently, LLM agents have attracted significant attention as a solution to these challenges, utilizing advanced capabilities such as planning, memory, and tool usage to meet the rigorous standards of legal practice. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of LLM agents for legal tasks, analyzing how these architectures bridge the gap between technical capabilities and domain-specific needs. Our major contributions include: (1) systematically analyzing the technical transition from standard legal LLMs to legal agents; (2) presenting a structured taxonomy of current agent applications across distinct legal practice areas; (3) discussing evaluation methodologies specifically for agentic performance in law; and (4) identifying open challenges and outlining future directions for developing robust and autonomous legal assistants.

cs.CL · cs.AI

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表