跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 15:59 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 16:03 — 2026-11-15 16:03(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 15:59最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 15:58(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.13024

GRAP: Gender Rubric-Aware Probing for Analyzing Gender Bias in LLMs

Seona Seo, Geonhee Ahn, Hyunsoo Cho, Sookyung Kim

原文摘要

As LLMs increasingly mediate everyday interactions, subtle gender biases in open-ended responses pose growing societal risks. Existing probing methods have two key limitations: they rely on fixed-format tasks, such as pronoun resolution or occupation association, that alignment-tuned models can easily handle; and they compare raw group-level rubric scores, ignoring per-dimension variance and obscuring which bias dimensions reliably distinguish gender groups. We introduce GRAP (Gender Rubric-Aware Probing), a framework that uses a lightweight logistic probe to identify the most discriminative bias dimensions from responses scored across 10 rubric dimensions, operating task-agnostically on open-ended instruction following.

cs.AI

版本更新 · v4arXiv:2610.02902

LUMOS: Tracing Parametric Knowledge from Training Data to Behavioral Outputs in LLMs

Seoyeon Ye, Gayoung Kim, Jiyoung Hong, Sookyung Kim, Hyunsoo Cho

原文摘要

Current analyses of LLMs' parametric knowledge are largely output-centric, drawing conclusions about what a model knows without verifying what it was actually trained on. This leaves fundamental questions, such as whether a correct response reflects genuine generalization or rote memorization, grounded in speculation rather than evidence. To resolve these ambiguities, we introduce LUMOS, a diagnostic framework that traces knowledge across training-data exposure, internal representations, and behavioral outputs, leveraging OLMo 2 with its fully transparent training corpus. By grounding analysis in verified exposure, we reveal that models internally encode rare facts with high separability (84%) yet fail to express them behaviorally (54%), though this retrieval gap narrows with scale. Furthermore, when models are asked to self-reflect on their own answers, they perform reliably on trained content (83%) but drop to random-baseline levels (49%) on unseen content. This collapse persists even under chain-of-thought prompting, which inflates confidence signals rather than improving calibration. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that incorporating the training-data axis into LLM evaluation transforms speculative diagnoses into verifiable claims, and we advocate that this axis should be a standard component of knowledge assessment in LLMs.

cs.AI

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2604.13699

MIND: AI Co-Scientist for Material Research

Geonhee Ahn, Donghyun Lee, Hayoung Doo, Jonggeol Na, Hyunsoo Cho, Sookyung Kim

原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) have enabled agentic AI systems for scientific discovery, but most approaches remain limited to textbased reasoning without automated experimental verification. We propose MIND, an LLM-driven framework for automated hypothesis validation in materials research. MIND organizes the scientific discovery process into hypothesis refinement, experimentation, and debate-based validation within a multi-agent pipeline. For experimental verification, the system integrates Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials, particularly SevenNet-Omni, enabling scalable in-silico experiments. We also provide a web-based user interface for automated hypothesis testing. The modular design allows additional experimental modules to be integrated, making the framework adaptable to broader scientific workflows. The code is available at: https://github.com/IMMS-Ewha/MIND, and a demonstration video at: https://youtu.be/lqiFe1OQzN4.

cs.MA · cs.AI · cs.CE