跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 19:17 — 2026-11-04 19:17(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39416

Decoding Geometry, Not Tokens: Efficient VLMs for Robot Affordance and Trajectory Prediction

Akila Ayanthi, Darshana Priyasad, Tharindu Fernando, Dimity Miller, Sridha Sridharan, Clinton Fookes, Peyman Moghadam

Predicting where to grasp and how to move is fundamentally a geometry problem. Vision-language models treat it as language generation instead. They tokenize spatial coordinates into text and decode them autoregressively. This mechanism ignores spatial structure and truncates continuous precision. Errors compound across coordinate tokens during decoding. In this paper, we show that compact off-the-shelf VLMs with 0.5-2B parameters already encode rich spatial information in their intermediate hidden states. Autoregressive decoding is the dominant bottleneck for trajectory prediction, while affordance prediction depends additionally on feature depth and decoder architecture. We expose the latent spatial information with a lightweight, geometry-compatible prediction head that attaches to a frozen backbone. It reads features from an intermediate hidden layer, conditions a learned query on the task instruction and refines it via cross-attention over the visual tokens to regress affordance boxes and trajectory waypoints directly as continuous values, without modifying the backbone. We evaluate on ShareRobot-Bench and AGD20K. Our 2B variant reduces trajectory error by over 60% and improves ShareRobot-Bench affordance mAP by 85% relative to the autoregressive baseline. It approaches RoboBrain on trajectory prediction (0.251 vs 0.191 DFD) at 3.8x higher throughput. These results demonstrate a favorable accuracy-efficiency trade-off for instruction-conditioned 2D geometric prediction.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.RO · cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗