跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1030新增论文
+790其中 AI 相关
+127已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 20:28 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 18:36各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 20:35 — 2026-11-11 20:35(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 20:28最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 18:36库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,673 已收录论文18,321 AI 相关6,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 20:25(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2609.28182

Finite-Sample Probabilistic Safety Certification for AI-Based Grid-Edge Coordination

Yihong Zhou, Hanbin Yang, Thomas Morstyn

原文摘要

Coordinating a large population of flexible grid-edge devices can alleviate the need for time-consuming and capital-intensive network upgrades. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based control methods such as multi-agent reinforcement learning or imitation learning are promising to this coordination due to their real-time decision scalability. However, system operators still need an independent and rigorous way to decide whether a given AI system is safe enough for deployment. This paper develops a \emph{finite-sample} probabilistic safety certification framework for AI-based grid-edge coordination. The central idea is to reduce the complete input--AI--decision--evaluation workflow to a binary unsafe outcome under an operator-defined safety specification, and then use exact binomial inference to certify the corresponding unsafe operation probability. Given a set of held-out calibration scenarios, the framework returns the tightest one-sided upper certificate and an accept/reject deployment criterion that controls the probability of false safety certification. Because the certification is for the calibration distribution that may \emph{deviate} from the future operation, we further combine the nominal certificate with physically interpretable sample-space adversarial attacks, a concept widely used in AI models to investigate their fragility. Case studies on grid-edge flexibility coordination with 1{,}000-agent AI models (independent parameters) verify the safety guarantee and the value of integrating adversarial attacks into a rolling-window training-certification-deployment flow.

cs.AI · cs.LG · eess.SY

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2604.24549

GradMAP: Gradient-Based Multi-Agent Proximal Learning for Grid-Edge Flexibility

Yihong Zhou, Hongtai Zeng, Thomas Morstyn

原文摘要

Coordinating large populations of grid-edge devices requires learning methods that remain decentralised in deployment while still respecting three-phase AC distribution-network constraints. This paper proposes gradient-based multi-agent proximal learning (GradMAP) to address this challenge. GradMAP trains independent neural network policies for each agent that makes online decisions without communication. During offline training, GradMAP embeds a differentiable power grid environment and uses implicit differentiation to propagate exact AC power flow gradients. To speed up training while maintaining performance, GradMAP reuses expensive environment gradients through a proximal surrogate within a trust region defined in the more direct policy-output space, instead of the probability distribution space used in PPO. Using a single workstation-class NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell GPU with 48~GB of memory, GradMAP trains 1,000 agents on the IEEE123 network in 15 minutes and 100,000 agents on the IEEE8500 network in 40 minutes, without parameter sharing. In both cases, GradMAP achieve the lowest mean daily maximum voltage violation and the lowest energy cost among all evaluated methods, including standard multi-agent reinforcement learning methods and gradient-based learning methods extended to the multi-agent setting by us. The training time to convergence is also the lowest, with a 5x to more than 10x training speedup compared to other methods.

cs.LG · cs.AI