跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文，按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-15 05:41 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 06:35 — 2026-11-15 06:35（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-15 05:41最近发现新增版本：2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 4 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 05:40（北京时间）
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.19882

Multimodal Concept Bottleneck Models

Tongqing Shi, Ge Yan, Tuomas Oikarinen, Tsui-Wei Weng

原文摘要

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) enhance the interpretability of deep neural networks by aligning the features extracted from images with human-interpretable concepts. However, conventional CBMs typically use a linear classifier that maps concept activations to a fixed set of predefined classes, limiting their flexibility in open-vocabulary settings. In this paper, we propose Multimodal Concept Bottleneck Model (MM-CBM) to address these issues and extend CBMs into CLIP structure. MM-CBM utilizes dual Concept Bottleneck Layers (CBLs) to align both the image and text embeddings into interpretable features. This allows us to perform new vision tasks like zero-shot classification or image retrieval in an interpretable way. Compared to existing methods, MM-CBM achieves 23.28% accuracy improvement on average across four standard benchmarks. Our method maintains competitive performance compared with black-box CLIP model while offering interpretability. Under classification tasks, MM-CBM's accuracy is on average 3.94% lower than CLIP in the target-dataset adaptation setting and 9.84% in the zero-shot transfer setting. Under image-text retrieval tasks, it achieves an average gap of 2.48% for image retrieval and 9.22% for text retrieval.

cs.CV · cs.LG

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v4arXiv:2602.09870

Steer2Edit: From Activation Steering to Component-Level Editing

Chung-En Sun, Ge Yan, Zimo Wang, Tsui-Wei Weng

原文摘要

Steering methods influence Large Language Model behavior by identifying semantic directions in hidden representations, but are typically realized through inference-time activation interventions that apply a fixed, global modification to the model's internal states. While effective, such interventions often induce unfavorable attribute-utility trade-offs under strong control, as they ignore the fact that many behaviors are governed by a small and heterogeneous subset of model components. We propose Steer2Edit, a theoretically grounded, training-free framework that transforms steering vectors from inference-time control signals into diagnostic signals for component-level rank-1 weight editing. Instead of uniformly injecting a steering direction during generation, Steer2Edit selectively redistributes behavioral influence across individual attention heads and MLP neurons, yielding interpretable edits that preserve the standard forward pass and remain compatible with optimized parallel inference. Across safety alignment, hallucination mitigation, and reasoning efficiency, Steer2Edit consistently achieves more favorable attribute-utility trade-offs: at matched downstream performance, it improves safety by up to 17.2%, increases truthfulness by 9.8%, and reduces reasoning length by 12.2% on average. Overall, Steer2Edit provides a principled bridge between representation steering and weight editing by translating steering signals into interpretable, training-free parameter updates. Our code is available at https://github.com/Trustworthy-ML-Lab/Steer2Edit

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v4arXiv:2605.09252

LLM Agents Already Know When to Call Tools -- Even Without Reasoning

Chung-En Sun, Linbo Liu, Ge Yan, Zimo Wang, Tsui-Wei Weng

原文摘要

Tool-augmented LLM agents tend to call tools indiscriminately, even when the model can answer directly. Each unnecessary call wastes API fees and latency, yet no existing benchmark systematically studies when a tool call is actually needed. We propose When2Tool, a benchmark of 18 environments (15 single-hop, 3 multi-hop) spanning three categories of tool necessity -- computational scale, knowledge boundaries, and execution reliability -- each with controlled difficulty levels that create a clear decision boundary between tool-necessary and tool-unnecessary tasks. We evaluate two families of training-free baselines: Prompt-only (varying the prompt to discourage unnecessary calls) and Reason-then-Act (requiring the model to reason about tool necessity before acting). Both provide limited control: Prompt-only suppresses necessary calls alongside unnecessary ones, and Reason-then-Act still incurs a disproportionate accuracy cost on hard tasks. To understand why these baselines fail, we probe the models' hidden states and find that tool necessity is linearly decodable from the pre-generation representation with AUROC 0.89--0.96 across six models, substantially exceeding the model's own verbalized reasoning. This reveals that models already know when tools are needed, but fail to act on this knowledge during generation. Building on this finding, we propose Probe&Prefill, which uses a lightweight linear probe to read the hidden-state signal and prefills the model's response with a steering sentence. Across all models tested, Probe&Prefill reduces tool calls by 38\% with only 1.7\% accuracy loss, while the best baseline at comparable accuracy only reduces 6% of tool calls, or achieves a similar tool call reduction but incurs a 5$\times$ higher accuracy loss. Our code is available at https://github.com/Trustworthy-ML-Lab/when2tool

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2611.07009

TraCE: Trajectory-Aware Concepts for Explainable Video Understanding

Wooil Lee, Junpyo Hong, Jongseo Lee, Tuomas Oikarinen, Tsui-Wei Weng, Jinwoo Choi

原文摘要

Video understanding models often rely on motion, yet their explanations can obscure which motion sources support a prediction. We identify motion-source under-specification as a limitation of existing video XAI: region-centric explanations can be source-ambiguous, while motion vocabularies restricted to single-person pose sequences are source-incomplete. We propose TraCE (Trajectory-Aware Concepts for Explainable Video Understanding), a concept-based framework that discovers source-flexible motion concepts by clustering optical-flow trajectories from training videos. These concepts represent dynamic evidence from people, objects, and interactions, while object and scene concepts account for static context. The resulting typed trajectory/object/scene interface supports class prediction for action recognition and question-conditioned concept matching for video question answering (VQA). We evaluate TraCE across five random seeds on six benchmarks: NTU RGB+D Mutual, Chiral SSv2, UCF-101, KTH, TOMATO, and STAR. Relative to non-interpretable baselines, TraCE maintains competitive task performance, with an average accuracy drop of 1.0 points for action recognition and a nominal gain of 0.4 points for VQA. Motion perturbation and concept-removal tests provide complementary evidence of directional semantic alignment and decision faithfulness, while sample-level interventions illustrate targeted model debugging. Our project page is available at https://leewooil.github.io/TraCE_project_page/.

cs.CV

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗