Retrieval-augmented Web applications increasingly employ multi-agent debate (MAD) to aggregate conflicting, noisy, and heterogeneous information, yet deliberation is fundamentally a social process susceptible to interpersonal dynamics. When retrieved Web sources contain latent hazards alongside safe factual content, social biases such as conformity pressure and authority deference can override evidence-grounded safety boundaries. In this work, we investigate whether the social structure of deliberation can paradoxically amplify latent Web safety risks. We introduce SafeConflict-Bias, a controlled counterfactual diagnostic protocol spanning six core Web risk categories, which holds queries and retrieved evidence strictly invariant while isolating conversational majority sway, authority cues, and confidence asymmetry. Empirical evaluation across diverse proprietary and open-source backbones reveals that while isolated models reliably reject unsafe guidance, standard MAD catastrophically capitulates to social pressure---surging unsafe adoption from 0.0\% up to 100.0\% and systematically silencing safe minority evidence. To resolve this systemic fragility without retraining or debate regeneration, we propose RiskTrace-Debias, an inference-time auditing framework uniting evidence-first precommitment, social-metadata masking, and consistency-gated arbitration. RiskTrace-Debias suppresses worst-case unsafe adoption to $\le 2.0\%$ across all architectures without inducing over-refusal, while generating verifiable provenance traces to audit interpersonal manipulation in Web deliberation.
World Action Models (WAMs) can condition robot actions on generated visual futures, but this additional context is neither cost-free nor uniformly beneficial. We examine what a predicted future actually changes: the action delta $Δa$ between the future-conditioned and future-free execution paths of the same model. Under a shared WAM checkpoint, this delta barely shifts average benchmark success ($+0.8$ points on LIBERO, $-0.8$ on RoboTwin~2.0), while generating visual futures increases inference latency by 1.7--1.9$\times$. These aggregate metrics conceal a concentrated failure mode that we term \emph{future-induced negative transfer}: while predictive deltas benefit long-horizon tasks ($+2.4$ points on LIBERO-Long) and remain negligible on most routine manipulations, they induce severe degradation on precision tasks---with \emph{Press Stapler} and \emph{Place Can Basket} losing 54.0 and 34.0 points, recurring as top failure modes across independently trained WAM variants. We introduce \textbf{Utility-WAM} for in-place correction of future-conditioned control. Its primary learning component is a residual adapter that repairs future-induced velocity deltas under a frozen shared WAM by aligning them with ground-truth dynamic guidance and penalizing excess error beyond the future-free baseline. The adapter selectively eliminates the majority of severe task drops (reducing losses to 6.0 and 14.0 points) while preserving long-horizon foresight. To eliminate superfluous video computation, a lightweight pre-generation gate reuses counterfactual action outcomes to selectively bypass video generation on 75.5\% of RoboTwin queries, cutting latency by 38\% while improving average success to 93.3\% on RoboTwin~2.0 and 98.9\% on LIBERO. On physical bimanual manipulation across three real-world tasks, Utility-WAM succeeds in 53 of 60 trials, compared to 43 for FAST-WAM.
Ensuring fairness in social survey simulation is critical, as biased outputs can misrepresent underrepresented groups. This issue is growing as large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for this task. However, standard fine-tuning based on Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) often under-optimizes minority groups, causing substantial subgroup disparities. Distributionally robust Optimization (DRO) methods reduce worst-case errors, but their strict worst-case selection can lead to noisy and unstable optimization under demographic sparsity. These issues create intertwined challenges for fairness, convergence and stability. We propose SAFO, a dynamic utility–fairness optimization framework for LLM-based survey simulation that explicitly targets both fairness and training stability. SAFO combines (i) an Optimizer that preserves mean-loss utility, (ii) an Adversary that performs temperature-controlled, EMA-smoothed and loss-driven group reweighting, and (iii) a Nash-inspired Regulator that adaptively adjusts the utility–fairness trade-off by tracking weak-group gains and collateral utility damages. Experiments on three large-scale survey datasets from China, the U.S., and Europe show that SAFO consistently improves minority performance and social-welfare metrics. It reduces worst-group gaps by up to 12.7%, maintains overall accuracy with a mean change of less than 0.3% and lowers variance across random seeds. Our code is available at https://github.com/PiLab-ZJU/SAFO.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表