Large reasoning models (LRMs) often suffer from overthinking, continuing with redundant verification and repeated attempts even after reaching a correct solution. This wastes computation and can overturn an initially correct answer. We show that the transition from productive to redundant reasoning is decodable from late-layer hidden states. These representations separate the two phases around first-correct-solution boundaries beyond what position and lexical controls explain, and distinguish correct from incorrect solution endings. Building on this finding, we propose ROM (Real-time Overthinking Mitigation), which uses a lightweight streaming detector (0.07--0.25\% of backbone parameters) to monitor a frozen LRM and intervene at well-formed reasoning boundaries without answer extraction or probe decoding. Counterfactual Self-Correction (CSC) augments detector training with wrong$\rightarrow$correct trajectories to preserve useful self-correction. Heads are trained separately for each backbone using shared MATH500 supervision and transfer zero-shot to four unseen benchmarks. Evaluated against ten baselines across five backbones from three families and five benchmarks, ROM$_{\text{CSC}}$ reduces response length by 28--77\% (45\% on average), with significant reductions in all 25 settings and accuracy matching or exceeding vanilla decoding in 22. Measurements on two backbones further show 20--70\% lower end-to-end latency with less than 0.5\% detector overhead per decoding step. Code is available at https://github.com/SaFo-Lab/ROM.
Self-evolving personal agents act for users and learn from user feedback. However, if an agent obeys an instruction that an untrusted third party hides in content, the third party gains control of the agent. Such indirect prompt injection (IPI) poses severe risks. We investigate whether self-evolution degrades the robustness of personal agents to IPI. To study this question, we design a controlled two-phase methodology. In the adaptation phase, the user asks the agent to read external content and complete the task described in it, a common request in daily use. The agent then learns from the user's feedback and improves itself as designed. In the test phase, a third party writes a similar task into new external content, but the user's test request does not authorize the injected task. Using this methodology, we build multiple tasks with diverse test instances in different domains for a real personal agent. Our extensive experiments reveal that self-evolution substantially degrades robustness to IPI. Specifically, compared with the base agent, which does not evolve from user feedback, the average attack success rate rises by 14.0--48.8 percentage points under skill evolution and by 3.0--39.3 percentage points under reinforcement learning, posing safety risks. The code is available at https://github.com/SaFo-Lab/Evolve-IPI
Typed decision models are an emerging class of language models that make decisions instead of generating free-text responses. They answer in a single fast and cheap query and are increasingly used, including in security-sensitive tasks. However, red teaming of these models leaves two gaps: existing adaptive attacks do not use their speed, and few studies have searched for universal adversarial examples. We fill both gaps on Jev, the representative typed decision model, with a quick black-box query-based attack that calls no attacker language model. We conduct extensive experiments on 12 datasets with different data types and application scenarios. The results show that Jev resists common prompt injections: no strategy changes a correct answer in 10,240 paired tests. In contrast, our attack finds short suffixes that flip confident answers within minutes. These suffixes are universal: one suffix per dataset flips 43% of unseen documents. Because typed decision models, unlike classic NLP models, can serve many tasks, we test whether these suffixes transfer across tasks. We find that one suffix generated from one task can flip 90-100% of the samples in other tasks. We therefore believe the evaluation of typed decision models must include strict adaptive attacks to fully reveal their robustness.
Weidong Tang, Jierui Li Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University and Xidian University, Yueling Hou Xi'an University of Electronic Science and Technology, Zihan Mei, Can Zhang, Xinyan Wan, Zhiyuan Liang University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, Pengfei Zhou 等 10 位作者
True general intelligence requires not only a model of the physical world but also a social world model: the capacity to infer how individual mental states interact and crystallize into group-level outcomes. Despite notable progress in individual-level Theory of Mind (ToM) reasoning, existing multimodal large language models systematically fail at this: collective behavior emerges non-linearly from social tensions, conformity dynamics, and structural constraints, and cannot be recovered by summing individual intentions. We present GroupToM-Bench, the first multimodal benchmark for group-level ToM, built around a causal chain spanning micro-level BDI states (belief, desire, intention), meso-level group tension and structural constraints, and macro-level outcome prediction and mechanistic attribution. To probe this full arc, we develop a seven-level cognitive audit framework. Experiments reveal that frontier models perform significantly below human levels, exposing fundamental blind spots in modeling social structures and nonlinear collective behavior.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表