跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 07:45 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 08:00 — 2026-11-15 08:00(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 07:45最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 07:44(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16386

Remember What Changes the Odds: Critic-Gated Event Memory for Long-Horizon Manipulation

Xuanzhuo Liu, Chuankang Li, Maoqing Yao, Guanghui Ren

原文摘要

In long-horizon manipulation, a robot may need to take different actions under identical observations, depending on task progress and the outcomes of earlier attempts. We refer to this ambiguity as decision aliasing. Resolving it requires the policy to maintain memory of its execution history. To reduce the cost of processing full observation histories, recent methods build compact event memories using perceptual, semantic, or kinematic cues. However, these criteria may miss events that matter for task success. We instead propose an outcome-grounded principle: remember events that substantially change the predicted probability of eventual success. Following this principle, we introduce CGEM, a critic-gated event memory that uses a critic to select events with large estimated changes in success probability. Positive and negative changes are encoded as progress and failure records, respectively. Failure records are discarded once the corresponding subtask is completed. In a ten-subtask diagnostic environment with exactly computed success probabilities, CGEM achieves 88.0% success, compared with 0.0% for both a 36-step observation window and a kinematic event memory. Removing failure records reduces success to 1.7%.

cs.RO