跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1新增论文
+1其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 07:07 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 06:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 08:39 — 2026-11-13 08:39(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 07:07最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 06:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,676 已收录论文18,324 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 07:05(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2605.29253

OpenClawBench: Benchmarking Process-side Anomalies in Real-world Agent Execution Trajectories

Yibing Liu, Yangze Liu, Xiaolong Yin, Bin Wang, Chong Zhang, Hao Yin, Zhongyi Han

原文摘要

Task success can hide process anomalies in real-world agent executions. An agent may pass the final task oracle while still accumulating unresolved ambiguity, unsafe external writes, ignored errors, weakly grounded commitments, or capability-boundary overcommitment. We study this mismatch as the Outcome-Process Gap and introduce OpenClawBench, a large-scale dataset for measuring and supervising process-side anomalies in real agent execution processes. OpenClawBench is built from BFCL-driven OpenClaw sessions produced by 6 source models and contains 31,264 annotated trajectories. FullTax converts the aligned trajectories into structured anomaly supervision: binary labels, supporting evidence, onset/span localization, severity, recoverability, and a 5-class anomaly taxonomy. Using OpenClawBench, we make the Outcome-Process Gap measurable. Among 31,135 oracle-passing executions, 2,904 (9.33%) are still labeled process-anomalous under FullTax. Within oracle-passing executions that contain high-risk process evidence, 1,765 of 1,904 (92.70%) are labeled anomalous. On Gold-300, a test subset labeled independently by two human annotators, silver labels match the final human binary label on 93.3% of trajectories. A LoRA-fine-tuned Gemma 3 12B detector trained on the high-confidence FullTax supervised pool reaches binary F1=0.729 on the cleaner-labels silver test split (n=2,646). It outperforms the GPT-5.4 frontier reference by +0.302 absolute, the no-fine-tuning base by +0.357, and wins on all six source-model agent slices. The gain comes from calibration rather than higher recall: zero-shot detectors over-flag at 42-50% against a 14.8% label rate, while the fine-tuned detector predicts anomalies 18.2% of the time. Together, OpenClawBench turns real agent execution logs into auditable and reusable supervision for studying, diagnosing, and operationally monitoring runtime agent reliability.

cs.AI

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04399

Silent Instrument Errors Reorder Agent Leaderboards

Yangze Liu

原文摘要

On a public agent leaderboard, a general-purpose agent trails a scaffold built for an airline customer-service benchmark by 13 points on the tasks that touch its database, and a reader could conclude that generality costs accuracy. The gap comes from the grader. The general agent often ends its conversations in a way that never triggers grading, so only about half of its episodes were scored and the rest were stored as failures. Grading the ungraded half under the benchmark's own rule closes the pooled gap, without rerunning any agent. We audit two carefully maintained public leaderboards, HAL and tau2-bench, from their published artifacts alone and find three more instrument errors. A cost column counts nested model calls twice, unevenly across rows. Archived trajectories record grader-written actions as agent actions. Re-grading saved trajectories under a newer evaluator is itself a new measurement: a correct and announced fix reorders a leaderboard, and a mode check that misreads four files collapses their scores by 59 to 82 points while printing no error. Each produced a plausible number, and the HAL maintainers confirmed their three within five weeks. Together the cases show that the infrastructure of agent evaluation, meaning the code that grades, logs, replays and versions an evaluation, is part of the measurement and fails silently, so scores and orderings can move with no visible sign. These failure modes follow from how agent evaluation pipelines are built, and those pipelines change as fast as the agents they measure, so we expect more of them elsewhere. We propose cheap checks that expose the instrument: report the graded fraction, aggregate cost from root spans, tag the provenance of every recorded action, and pin evaluator versions with a published re-grade diff.

cs.AI · cs.SE