跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 06:05 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 06:19 — 2026-11-13 06:19(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 06:05最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 06:03(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.17478

From Hidden States to Confessions: Auditing Deception in Reasoning Models

Kexin Chen, Dongxia Wang, Haonan Zhang, Yanhui Li, Xinyu Deng, Yi Liu

原文摘要

As LLMs acquire stronger reasoning capabilities, deceptive behavior becomes an increasingly serious safety concern. Existing deception monitors typically either score visible transcripts or derive scalar probe scores from representation vectors, leaving little inspectable evidence about why a response is suspicious. We introduce StateWitness, an audit decoder for deception monitoring. It reads a target model's hidden states to answer audit queries and produce confession-style reports of potential failures or violations. We evaluate generalization beyond the decoder's audit training data across two target reasoning models and seven deception datasets. StateWitness achieves 0.916 mean AUROC, with relative gains of 11.6% and 25.0% over the best black-box and activation-probe baselines, respectively, under the same evaluation protocol. When combined with existing monitors, StateWitness reduces missed deceptive examples in simple threshold ensembles. Beyond scalar detection, the decoder returns query-level answers, schema reports, and token- or sentence-level evidence traces for human inspection. We envision StateWitness as one monitoring layer in a broader defense-in-depth strategy.

cs.CL · cs.AI