跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 15:29 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 16:30 — 2026-11-09 16:30(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 15:29最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 15:27(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09712

ICare-DT: a digital twin for continuous forecasting of intensive care patients

Yanke Li, Yahang Qi, Yumi Kim, Diego Paez-Granados

原文摘要

Digital twins of intensive care patients should update forecasts from new data and predict treatment responses, but few studies test whether routine records support either. We propose ICare-DT, a Transformer-based twin that updates a latent patient state hourly from new measurements without retraining. We trained it on 140,473 eICU-CRD stays to forecast vital signs crossing their training-set means. On test data, later forecasts beat the twin's own hour-6 forecasts of the same windows in all 12 settings (+0.073 to +0.153 AUROC). On validation data, controls that withheld or swapped the new hours traced the gain to the patient's own measurements. Without refitting, the model kept its gain on a second database (8 of 9 settings, +0.025 to +0.114 AUROC) in a prespecified evaluation of the previously analyzed MIMIC-IV test split. Refitted within MIMIC-IV, a twin state fine-tuned on clinical endpoints gave gradient boosting a significant gain for acute kidney injury (+0.0035 AUROC; hypotension +0.0010, not significant). To test response prediction, we built a benchmark that replaces the treatments in real records with simulated doses and injects responses of known size, visible only at measurement times. Ridge models supervised with injected effects recovered them from real records only through frequently measured variables (heart rate) read at their measurement times. We asked standard learners to predict these effects for a dosing regime no patient had received. No standard learner outperformed predicting zero effect at an out-of-support query. When told how the simulated responses were generated, a separate learner recovered the effects from the same records without seeing their true values (R2 0.30 to 0.40 at one effect size). Routine records support forecasts that improve with each patient's new data, and our benchmark is a testbed for models that learn how responses are generated.

cs.LG · cs.AI

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09400

Causal graph fusion across incomplete cohorts and causal steering of tabular foundation models

Yanke Li, Dhiyaa Al Jorf, Ayoube Ighissou, Anke Scheel-Sailer, Robert Riener, Diego Paez-Granados

原文摘要

Clinical data are split across incomplete cohorts with partially overlapping variables. Causal discovery under missing data and multi-source integration have developed separately, and tabular foundation models cannot take a causal graph without retraining. We make two contributions. First, causal graph fusion learns a partial ancestral graph on the shared variables, fuses it into each cohort's graph under temporal background knowledge and lets Markov blankets guide re-imputation, so missing data are handled inside discovery. Second, causal attention steering compiles the learned graph into the attention of a frozen tabular foundation model at inference. Against known ground truth, fusion dominates pooled and per-cohort baselines in every missingness and heterogeneity condition tested (p<0.001), and steering improves discrimination under distribution shift (p<10^{-5}), a gain that a random graph does not produce. In two spinal cord injury cohorts, fusion orients age, albumin and hemoglobin as ancestors of length of stay, a set no single cohort orients in full, and yields compact, temporally ordered predictor sets that match or exceed automatic feature selection on four of five outcomes.

cs.LG · stat.AP