跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1087新增论文
+804其中 AI 相关
+107已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 11:06 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 20:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-13 11:13 — 2026-11-14 11:13(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 11:06最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 20:44库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,727 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 11:04(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14774

An LLM Is All You Need: Data-Efficient Adaptation to Full-Duplex, Word-Level Spoken Dialogue

Tairan Chen, Richard Yucheng He, Yihang Liu, Baodong Cao, Chen Xu

原文摘要

Full-duplex spoken dialogue, in which a system listens while it speaks and can backchannel, yield the floor, and be interrupted, is usually obtained by training on hundreds of thousands to millions of hours of speech. This is costly, rewrites the language model that supplies the system's knowledge, and still leaves turn-taking either implicit or decided coarsely rather than word by word. We show that a frozen, general-purpose multimodal LLM can instead be adapted into a word-level full-duplex system with little data. Our system is a thinker-talker cascade on an 80 ms frame clock. The thinker keeps the LLM frozen and trains only lightweight adapters and a few new token embeddings (97M parameters); at every frame it emits one token of agent text, with pauses, yields, and onsets represented as tokens of the same vocabulary and kept legal by a finite-state machine. A four-stage curriculum, each stage anchored to the model's own behavior under the previous format, performs the conversion in about 30 GPU-hours. The talker reads only the thinker's discrete tokens, so the two halves are trained independently. On Full-Duplex-Bench and InteractionBench, the system is competitive with open-source full-duplex systems built through large-scale speech training: among them, it is the least likely to take the floor when the user merely pauses, backchannels most often, and leads in spoken-task accuracy, groundedness, and coherence over long conversations.

cs.CL · cs.SD · eess.AS

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05058

Do Agentic Policies Need to Look at Every Step? Geometric Abstraction for Reasoning and Action

Yihang Liu, Yiming Chen, Mingzhe Zheng

原文摘要

Recent multimodal language models can reason directly about robot scenes, but it is unclear whether they need to repeatedly reinterpret raw visual observations at every step of an interaction. We propose shifting routine spatial reasoning from images to text and symbols through a 3D geometric abstraction that is refreshed locally from observations and read directly by the language models. Specifically, our interface represents scene geometry via typed, evidence-aware symbolic references to object parts, grounds them from calibrated RGB-D, and returns compact textual checkpoints with metric residuals after each action. Symbolic task structure can thus be reused across decisions while metric values are rebound to the current scene, with direct visual reasoning invoked only on demand. Across offline policy synthesis and continuous online execution, reasoning over grounded text and symbols improves multi-step manipulation completion while substantially reducing repeated multimodal queries, positioning explicit geometric state as an effective substrate for agentic robot policies.

cs.RO · cs.AI · cs.CV

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02430

InteractionBench: Measuring Timing, Task Accuracy, Whisper and Volume, and Grounding in Real-Time Voice Systems

Richard Yucheng He, Chen Xu, Yihang Liu, Tairan Chen, Baodong Cao

原文摘要

Most benchmarks for real-time voice systems focus on one aspect, such as turn-taking, instruction following, paralinguistic control, or conversational memory, each with its own data and set of systems. We present InteractionBench, a benchmark and evaluation harness that measures four dimensions on the same systems from the same recorded user audio: conversational timing, spoken-task accuracy, whisper and volume, and groundedness in conversations of more than twenty turns. The benchmark contains 221 items per system in thirteen scenarios. Before any system runs, we fix the expected floor-control actions for spoken tasks by rule and take the expected answers from scripted dialogues. We score whispering from the audio signal. We evaluate GPT-Live, GPT-Realtime, Gemini Live, Moshi, PersonaPlex, Freeze-Omni, and a turn-based cascade in 1,519 graded runs. Among the six full-duplex systems, timing and spoken-task accuracy are rank-correlated ($ρ= 0.83$), while the cascade has the highest spoken-task score (38/50) and the second-lowest timing score. No system corrects a user's grammar within the required window. Only Gemini Live whispers on most requests (8/10). Hosted systems pass 67-88% of groundedness probes, compared with 14-35% for open full-duplex models. Timing is measured where the client hears each system, so the timing of hosted systems includes network delay: for GPT-Live, whose server reports its own clock, removing a delay of about 1.5 s lowers its timing score from 86% to 56%. We also document where the protocol differs across systems, including the text instructions.

cs.SD · cs.CL · eess.AS