跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 19:05 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 19:40 — 2026-11-15 19:40(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 19:05最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 19:03(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.19423

Beyond the Trial-and-Error Loop: Hybrid Projection and Automated Tuning for Distributed Training

Anshu Raina, Peyman Razaghi, Yuankai Chen, Cheng Yao, Yao Fu, Vidushi Goyal, Devang Patel, Wen Xie 等 10 位作者

原文摘要

Configuring distributed LLM training across hundreds of GPUs requires jointly optimizing tensor, pipeline, expert, context, and data parallelism alongside micro-batch size, recomputation, sharding, and overlap, a combinatorial space where memory legality can hinge on a single byte of activation accounting. Today, teams navigate it through expensive multi-node trial and error, burning GPU-hours on crashes and suboptimal recipes. We present Primus Projection, which closes this loop with two coupled components. First, a hybrid projection engine that measures what it can and simulates what it cannot: GPU microbenchmarks on as few as a single device capture compute kernels and any in-scope communication; a sub-node downscale-measure-upscale workflow analytically restores out-of-scope collectives, FSDP overlap, and the full pipeline schedule at the multi-node target. A pure simulation mode runs entirely on CPU, enabling pre-silicon planning without any GPU. Second, the Primus Tuning Agent treats the projection engine as a fast scoring oracle (seconds per candidate instead of tens of minutes) and uses it to drive an intelligent search over the configuration space. A deterministic seed planner sweeps single axes; an LLM investigation loop proposes cross-axis combinations the planner cannot reach, with an analytic memory pre-filter that rejects infeasible candidates before any GPU time is spent. Validated on Llama 3.1 (dense) and Mixtral 8x22B (MoE) across two GPU generations, all projections stay within ~10% of measured multi-node throughput, and fidelity holds at production scale: 4.7% error on DeepSeek V3 671B at 1,024 GPUs and 1.9% on Qwen3-235B-A22B at 256 GPUs. In a Mixtral 8x22B case study, the Primus Tuning Agent discovers a configuration delivering +27% throughput over the published 4-node BF16 reference at the same scale, in under 30 minutes of single-node exploration.

cs.AI · cs.DC

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.01946

Closed-Form 6-DoF Pose Estimation of Medical Tools via Gradiometer-Based Electromagnetic Localization System

Zhiwei Wu, Jiahao Luo, Yubo Pu, Siyi Wei, Yuankai Chen, Jinhui Zhang

原文摘要

Electromagnetic tracking \added[]{is promising for} remote navigation of endoluminal \added[]{medical tools}. However, existing six-degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) pose recovery approaches often require pre-calibrated workspace field maps or iterative nonlinear optimization. This letter presents a Gradiometer-Based Electromagnetic Localization System (GELS), a closed-form tracking framework that uses a compact magnetometer array as an embedded quasi-gradiometer to estimate local magnetic fields and gradient tensors. These quantities are mapped by the Euler homogeneous relation to displacements between source and array, from which Procrustes registration over multiple sources recovers the array orientation and position using at least three noncollinear sources. The algorithm requires known source positions and array geometry, but no pre-calibrated workspace field maps, initial pose guesses, or calibrated source magnetic moments. The recovered \added[]{array} pose also enables a demonstration of sublevel dipole localization by serving as a mobile magnetic reference frame. Benchtop experiments across sensor array configurations and excitation modes validate the proposed closed-form 6-DoF localization pipeline, with a median solver runtime of \SI{172.00}{\micro\second}. A perturbation analysis identifies inter-sensor inconsistency and dipole model mismatch as dominant accuracy limits, informing future sensor array and source design to improve pose accuracy.

cs.RO