跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 17:01 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 18:01 — 2026-11-15 18:01(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 17:01最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 16:59(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2605.20436

Lighting-aware Unified Model for Instance Segmentation

Qisai Liu, Alloy Das, Zhanhong Jiang, Joshua R. Waite, Aditya Balu, Adarsh Krishnamurthy, Soumik Sarkar

原文摘要

Foundation models like the Segment Anything Model (SAM) demonstrate impressive zero-shot generalization but frequently degrade under diverse real-world illumination, particularly for instance segmentation. In this work, we address this limitation by developing Lighting Convolutional-Attention (LCA), an adapter module that enhances segmentation robustness without fine-tuning the heavy backbone. LCA employs a dual-branch architecture to process RGB features alongside contrast maps, enabling physically motivated sensitivity to structural changes rather than illumination artifacts. We optimize LCA through a pairwise training strategy, introducing a targeted loss term that explicitly penalizes discrepancies between clean images and their corresponding illumination variants. To evaluate and support this architecture, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study across multiple existing benchmarks and present a novel Unity-based synthetic dataset specifically designed to accurately replicate complex real-world lighting conditions. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our approach successfully bridges the domain gap, delivering superior lighting-robust segmentation.

cs.CV

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10785

Proximal Preference Optimization: A Unified Framework for Stable and Reward-Free Alignment

Qisai Liu, Zhanhong Jiang, Zahid Hasan, Soumik Sarkar

原文摘要

We introduce a proximal preference optimization framework that unifies the implicit reward formulation of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) with the trust-region stability of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). Our framework yields two complementary algorithms. P$^2$O (Proximal Preference Optimization) introduces a clipped importance ratio directly into the DPO preference margin, producing a reward-model-free algorithm that supports safe dataset reuse, bounded policy divergence, and monotonic preference improvement guarantees. PKTO (Proximal Kahneman-Tversky Optimization) extends P$^2$O by replacing the DPO margin with KTO's prospect-theoretic utility margins, adding a self-regulating adaptive baseline that tightens the effective trust region as the policy drifts, and an asymmetric weighting that handles imbalanced or asymmetric preference datasets. We provide a unified theoretical analysis, including Kullback Leibler (KL) trust-region bounds, a policy-improvement lower bound, and convergence guarantees under multi-epoch proximal updates. Empirically, P$^2$O and PKTO match or exceed DPO and KTO in alignment quality while maintaining better stability under repeated dataset reuse across multiple LLMs on three preference benchmarks. The code base is available here.

cs.LG · cs.AI

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05841

Vision Paper: Why Distributed LLM Post-Training and Decentralized Alignment Are Now Essential

Zhanhong Jiang, Qisai Liu, Soumik Sarkar

原文摘要

This vision paper argues that distributed learning, including federated and decentralized, should become a first-class paradigm in LLM post-training, not merely a privacy add-on. Current methods like RLHF and DPO rest on an invisible assumption: preference data should be centralized. We contend this assumption is scientifically unjustified, practically unsustainable, and ethically problematic. As LLMs deploy into healthcare, law, finance, and multilingual communities, preference data originates from populations that cannot or will not centralize. We develop a three-pillar argument grounded in (1) privacy and data sovereignty, (2) pluralism and representational equity, and (3) robustness and scalability. We formalize key technical challenges unique to this intersection, reference drift, preference heterogeneity, and the DP-utility trade-off for contrastive losses, and propose concrete algorithmic directions, and sketch a research agenda. Our analysis shows distributed post-training is not only necessary but tractable, and ignoring it risks AI that is legally noncompliant, representationally narrow, and brittle at scale.

cs.AI