跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 10:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 13:44 — 2026-11-15 13:44(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 10:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 10:50(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14953

RSLiveBench-UAV: A Continually Evolving Vision-Language Benchmark for Aerial Spatial Intelligence

Yue Zhou, Jiawei Liu, Jue Chen, Ziyang Gong, Haojia Wei, Jingxiang Li, Xue Jiang, Zhihang Zhong 等 12 位作者

原文摘要

Aerial spatial intelligence (ASI) requires models to understand objects and spatial relationships across changing viewpoints and scales. Evaluating these abilities as models evolve calls for fresh physical observations, yet producing new aerial spatial questions requires repeatedly establishing entity identities, geometric references, and cross-view correspondences. We introduce \textbf{RSLiveBench-UAV}, a continually evolving vision-language benchmark driven by recurring acquisition of real UAV imagery. Its update protocol admits images captured after the preceding release and delays answer disclosure. An entity-centered production workflow uses geometry-assisted association to link repeated observations of physical vehicles, reuse human-verified attributes, and combine them with view-specific annotations and spatial references for traceable question generation. All tasks use deterministic scoring without model judges. We evaluate 30 general-purpose, remote-sensing, and embodied models on 35,491 question records from ten scenes, covering 17 tasks across 2D perception, 3D perception, cross-view perception, and reasoning. All 18 tested embodied models outperform the three selected remote-sensing comparators in Overall, although the strongest embodied model scores 43.29 versus 59.88 for GPT-6-Astra. Fine-grained vehicle recognition remains challenging, and performance varies across heights and camera pitches. Retrospective scene-group comparisons and rolling-window replay characterize score-pattern consistency under scene renewal. RSLiveBench-UAV connects fresh physical observations, entity-centered answer production, and systematic model evaluation to support continual assessment of ASI. Benchmark will release at https://rslivebench.space

cs.CV

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.06911

BEAKER:面向自驱动化学实验室具身大脑的专家精选基准

BEAKER: An Expert-Curated Benchmark for Embodied Brains in Self-Driving Chemical Laboratories

Fei Lin, Tengchao Zhang, Ziyang Gong, Xiaotong Yu, Bohan Zhang, Yifan Zhou, Qihao Yang, Ji Dai 等 18 位作者

AI 速读 基于摘要

作者提出并构建了专家人工标注的 BEAKER 基准,用于评测多模态大模型在自驱动化学实验室中的执行导向具身能力。

cs.AI

查看原文摘要

Self-Driving Chemical Laboratories (SDCLs) are moving chemical experimentation toward embodied automation, where machines must perceive laboratory scenes, reason about experimental states, and act under physical, procedural, and safety constraints. Although Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly considered as embodied brains for such systems, existing laboratory benchmarks mainly focus on safety, anomaly detection, or general scientific understanding, leaving their execution-oriented embodied capabilities underexplored. To fill this gap, we introduce BEAKER, a Benchmark for evaluating Embodied Actionability, Knowledge, Experimentation, and Reasoning in SDCLs. BEAKER contains 1,000 expert-curated question-answer samples across 11 image and video task types, covering key judgments required for chemical laboratory execution, including affordance grounding, trajectory planning, equipment, state, and safety recognition, apparatus setup, operation and step reasoning, and temporal procedure reasoning. All questions and annotations are manually created and reviewed by chemistry and embodied Artificial Intelligence (AI) experts, without AI-assisted generation or annotation. We evaluate 28 general-purpose, science-oriented, chemistry-specialized, and embodied MLLMs in an offline, single-turn setting. Results show that current models can follow coarse experimental procedures in videos, but still struggle to ground actions into operable regions and feasible trajectories, to recognize fine-grained laboratory apparatus, states, and safety norms, and to order steps in mid-length procedures. BEAKER thus reveals a clear gap between coarse procedural understanding and the precise, action-grounded perception required for laboratory execution, providing a diagnostic benchmark for future MLLMs in SDCLs.

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05802

GREP: Grounding Generated Room Evaluation in Principles

Mohan Cao, Yongsen Mao, Chucheng Xiang, Zhongyuan Liu, Zhihang Zhong, Haiping Wang, Yuan Liu

原文摘要

Recent LLM-centric advances can generate attractive furnished rooms by selecting and arranging assets. Yet evaluation remains limited to specific perspectives or predefined questions, failing to reflect overall scene quality. To address this pressing need, we introduce GREP. Its core is a focus shift from defining specific questions to establishing a three-tier evaluation philosophy: basic physical validity checks whether a scene obeys physical constraints; visual coherence concerns compatibility in object scale, style, and composition; and, at the highest level, human-use logic requires object arrangements to align with everyday human habits. Guided by these principles, an evaluation agent autonomously and adaptively identifies issues from scene context, gathers evidence, and produces scores and reports. This supports scene-specific issue discovery and reliable judgments. Experiments show that (1) GREP achieves 87% agreement with human majority preferences, substantially outperforming baseline evaluators. (2) GREP reports improve scene quality through refinement, whereas score-only and no-feedback baselines show slight declines. (3) GREP suggests that as planning ability improves, recent models such as GPT-5.6 Sol can move from relying on pipelines and harnesses to challenging their guidance and constraints, but still lack the ability to resolve the resulting conflicts. Stronger models are therefore expected not only to plan well, but also to adapt to external guidance and constraints more flexibly. Project page: https://han-808.github.io/GREP/

cs.CV · cs.AI · cs.GR