跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1196新增论文
+992其中 AI 相关
+66已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 11:15 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 11:14各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 11:37 — 2026-11-10 11:37(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 11:15最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 11:14库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-08 04:43

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

19,084 已收录论文16,280 AI 相关4,962 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 11:14(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2609.19150

Sampling Reveals Style: Unsupervised, Training-Free Discovery of Prompt-Conditional Stylistic Axes in LLM Activations

Ajit Mallavarapu, Ziwei Gu

原文摘要

Large language models (LLMs) encode rich stylistic structure in their hidden activations, but discovering which stylistic dimensions are salient for a given prompt typically requires supervised contrastive data. We present a training-free, prompt-conditional alternative: we repeatedly sample completions of a single prompt at elevated temperature, apply Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to the pooled hidden activations, and label the resulting axes automatically from the pole generations. We validate the discovered axes against 245 human-elicited stylistic annotations in a two-phase study. On our strongest model (Qwen-3.5-4B-Instruct), the top two axes match spontaneously requested human dimensions with 72.8% precision and 43.6% macro-recall, and 75.6% of validity ratings judge the axes' polar generations accurate to their labels, with 90.9% adjacent inter-annotator agreement. Discoverability is strongly model-dependent: both Qwen models and Llama-3.2-3B expose human-salient axes, while DeepSeek-7B-Chat drops to 35.3% precision, its leading components dominated by structural rather than stylistic variance. Simple PCA over a model's own decoding variance is thus an effective, low-cost probe of stylistic structure in LLM representations, one that also exposes sharp cross-model differences in how that structure is organized.

cs.CL · cs.LG

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.29140

From AI-Free Gates to AI-First Work: How Engineering Students in India Navigate University Education and Career Preparation Without AI Guidelines

Samhitha Goutham, Ziwei Gu

原文摘要

Engineering graduates in India enter a technology sector that is being reshaped by generative AI, yet the route into that sector runs through examinations and campus placement screens that largely exclude AI. Institutions in India have an approved intake of nearly 2.9 million seats in engineering and technology for 2026-2027, but HCI research on how students prepare for AI-mediated work has drawn mostly on Western and East Asian settings. We interviewed 23 students and recent graduates of Indian engineering and computing programmes about how they used generative AI across coursework, examinations and placements, and how they judged their own readiness for work. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we report five themes, covering AI-first workplaces and AI-free placement screens, how participants prepared for placement, how they used AI in coursework, the role of faculty authority and enforcement, and participants' concerns about their readiness for work. Drawing on signaling theory, we discuss what grades and screen scores certify once AI can help produce them, and we offer recommendations for employers, institutions and AI tool designers.

cs.HC · cs.AI