跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1163新增论文
+868其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 07:02 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 07:46 — 2026-11-06 07:46(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 07:02最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 07:00(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.37478

HGPRGDel: GPR-Aware Learning and Ranking for Growth-Coupled Gene Deletion Design

Ziwei Yang, Takeyuki Tamura

Designing microbial strains for growth-coupled production, in which cellular growth is linked to the synthesis of a target compound through genetic interventions, is a fundamental goal in metabolic engineering. Constraint-based methods can identify growth-coupled deletion strategies, but design for each target typically requires a separate search across a large number of possible gene-deletion combinations. This motivates a reusable approach that learns from previously evaluated strain designs to prioritize candidate interventions before downstream constraint-based evaluation. We present a reproducible protocol for growth-coupled gene deletion design that learns and ranks gene-deletion priorities for each target metabolite. Using computationally curated deletion strategies as learning resources, the protocol generates continuous deletion-priority rankings, constructs candidate strategies at adjustable search-space budgets, and evaluates these candidates through constraint-based metabolic analysis. Its learning component, HGPRGDel, explicitly represents gene-protein-reaction (GPR) logic, capturing how multiple genes can jointly support a reaction or alternative genes can maintain its activity, while integrating molecular and reaction-level information. Across e_coli_core, iMM904, and iML1515, the protocol achieves the highest macro-F1 and AUC among the evaluated learning configurations. HGPRGDel's rankings recovered an average of 90% of the reference deletion genes from MetNetComp by examining fewer genes than the evaluated baseline methods. By separating learned intervention prioritization from downstream constraint-based assessment, the protocol provides a reproducible framework for reusing strain-design knowledge while controlling the size of the candidate space and retaining mechanistic evaluation of growth-coupled production.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

q-bio.QM · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗