跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1029新增论文
+789其中 AI 相关
+127已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 18:22 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 13:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 18:26 — 2026-11-11 18:26(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 18:22最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 13:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,672 已收录论文18,320 AI 相关6,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 18:20(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.33026

False Belief Dissemination, Persistence and Mitigation in Multi-Agent Social Networks Through the Lens of the Mandela Effect

Dianzhi Yu, Hongru Wang, Ziheng Xiong, Yanyu Chen, Zixing Song, Jianting Chen, Zhenfei Yin, Jeff Z. Pan 等 10 位作者

原文摘要

Multi-agent social networks are emerging as communities in which agents communicate, retain memories, and publish information that others can find as evidence. These interactions create opportunities for false claims to spread and remain influential beyond their original sources, analogous to the Mandela effect in human societies, in which many people recall the same false memory. In this paper, we systematically study false-belief dynamics through the lens of the Mandela effect, focusing on dissemination, persistence, and mitigation. Specifically, we build a controlled framework connecting agent communication, private memory, and a shared simulated web to mimic information dissemination in practical social networks, supported by 540 fabricated claims spanning 8 domains and 4 plausibility levels. For dissemination, we measure how widely and quickly claims gain acceptance across models and communication topologies. For persistence, we withdraw agents promoting fabricated claims while retaining existing articles and memories, and track subsequent acceptance. For mitigation, we compare preventive measures applied before implantation with corrective interventions introduced after claims have spread. Experimental results show that evaluated models readily accept and disseminate fabricated claims, with dissemination reach as high as 96.0%. Dissemination reach varies with claim plausibility, domain, and network size and composition, while communication topology shapes dissemination speed across model families. Acceptance barely declines after fabricators withdraw, and targeted corrective interventions outperform the preventive measures without eliminating false beliefs. These findings identify persistent false beliefs as a safety challenge for multi-agent social networks and highlight the need to address both their initial dissemination and the accumulated evidence that sustains them.

cs.SI · cs.LG · cs.MA

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38486

Beyond Reachability: When Edit Order Preserves Couplings in Graph Flow Matching

Zilin Li, Zixing Song

原文摘要

Shortest-path optimality does not guarantee that a memoryless graph generator preserves a prescribed source-target correspondence. We study whether reordering legal shortest edits can retain this correspondence without changing the pairing, mandatory edits, or sampling budget. Under a common Poisson clock, we establish an exact criterion for endpoint coupling recoverability: the source-blind Markov projection attains the unavoidable clock-error floor if and only if routes to distinct targets do not share graph states. Routes to the same target may merge without sacrificing endpoint fidelity. This characterization leads to an exact finite-state routing formulation and a legality-preserving scheduling procedure with recovery certificates. A marker-free construction demonstrates how shared edge structure can retain source distinctions, while a capacity-constrained family exhibits a sharp separation in paired error between edit orders with identical marginal error. Finally, a target-conditioned aliasing bound connects structural route design to the terminal fidelity of a learned graph-only generator. These results characterize when legal edit ordering can preserve a prescribed coupling under fixed operational costs.

cs.IT · cs.LG

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.35083

Ask Before You Answer: A Question-Driven Evidence Reasoning Architecture (QERA) for In-Context Learning

Jinhu Qi, Minda Hu, Wentao Zhang, Zixing Song, Irwin King

原文摘要

AI assistants are increasingly asked to reason over a user's own web traces: group chats, community threads, activity logs and revision histories. On CL-bench Life, a benchmark of such real-life context learning, frontier LLMs solve fewer than one task in five. We find that the request is not the specification: over 80% of the benchmark's rubrics share less than 60% of their content words with the final request, as for a rule set two turns earlier or every record that meets the user's criterion, and LLMs answering directly pass only 67% of these implicit rubrics against 81% of the others. We propose QERA, a Question-driven Evidence Reasoning Architecture that asks before it answers. QERA first turns the request into a requirement checklist and typed information needs, filtered by code for faithfulness to the user's words; it then answers from the whole conversation, asks the same questions again with quotes verified by code, and applies a guarded local repair. It needs no training or rubrics and makes about four LLM calls per task. On all 405 tasks with four frontier LLMs, QERA attains the highest solving rate on every LLM (21.0% on average, against 18.2% for the strongest of three inference-time baselines and 14.6% for direct answering) and leads every baseline significantly when pooled across LLMs, while using fewer tokens than PSCI and 4-5% of the tokens of Ctx2Skill. Ablations on GPT-6-Luna show that the gain is settled before the answer, by a fixed answer protocol (+3.8 rubric points) and the request-specific questions (+1.6), and that it is concentrated on implicit rubrics, with checking afterwards refining mainly numeric requirements.

cs.CL