跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文，按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 02:39 — 2026-11-16 02:39（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本：2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 5 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33（北京时间）
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15639

ChJGBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Chinese Legal Judgment Generation with Diagnostic Evaluation

Yinghao Hu, Linggang Kong, Qian Xiao, Yuting Huang, Yunlong Zhang, Yujie Zhang, Yiquan Wu, Fei Duan 等 12 位作者

原文摘要

With the rapid development of LLMs, increasing attention has been paid to whether they can reliably generate complete and legally valid judicial documents. This calls for a benchmark capable of evaluating whether models can accurately apply statutes and resolve outcome-critical issues, including claims, charges, penalties, and monetary obligations. However, existing benchmarks typically focus on isolated legal tasks or coarse-grained evaluation. We introduce ChJGBench, a benchmark for generating the reasoning and dispositive sections of Chinese judgments across civil, criminal, and administrative cases. Built from 3,462 real-world judgments, ChJGBench provides a case-type-aware diagnostic evaluation framework comprising 13 metric types and adopts a hybrid paradigm. Experiments reveal no uniform advantage for legal-domain models over general-purpose models, with model strengths varying across diagnostic dimensions. Performance is generally stronger on criminal cases, while civil and administrative cases continue to present substantial challenges.

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.15346

Towards Better Legal Reasoning LLMs: Signal Balancing and Reward Scheduling

Yinghao Hu, Qian Xiao, Yuting Huang, Kaisong Song, Yiquan Wu, Ang Li, Junjie Cao, Jun Lin 等 10 位作者

原文摘要

In the legal domain, LLMs can improve reliability and interpretability by generating explicit reasoning traces. However, training LLMs to produce high-quality reasoning traces remains challenging. Existing supervised fine-tuning methods struggle when reasoning traces are significantly longer than final answers, as the learning signal for the answer becomes diluted. Meanwhile, reinforcement learning methods such as Group Relative Policy Optimization also have several limitations, including costly reward design, performance plateaus, and reward hacking. We therefore propose a two-stage training framework. In Stage I, JurisCoT-SFT employs a length-normalized dual objective to balance learning signals between reasoning traces and final answers. In Stage II, Lifecycle-Aware Backtrackable Policy Optimization dynamically evaluates and retires auxiliary reward signals based on their impact on final evaluation objectives, enabling efficient reward utilization. Our framework substantially improves legal reasoning performance on relevant tasks selected from multiple legal benchmarks, including ChJGBench, LawBench, and LegalBench. Experimental results demonstrate consistent improvements in both reasoning trace quality and final answer accuracy, while our models remain competitive with larger models.

cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.13135

Which Successes Make Good References? Action-Sequence Alignment for Multi-Turn On-Policy Distillation

Mufei Li, Nikki Lijing Kuang, Zhuoer Wang, Samson Koelle, Jie Yuan, Manqing Mao, Hong Wang, Yanjun Lin 等 12 位作者

原文摘要

On-policy distillation (OPD) reduces train-inference distribution mismatch by supervising a student on its own trajectories. For multi-turn tool-use agents, conditioning the teacher on a validated same-task successful trajectory as a reference can provide useful hindsight, but different successes may reach incompatible interaction states and offer misleading supervision. We cast successful-reference selection as a free-target optimal transport problem, which reduces to assigning each failed trajectory its most compatible successful reference. Because latent state paths are hidden, we use action-sequence alignment as an observable proxy for compatibility and instantiate it with longest common subsequence (LCS), which identifies a shared ordered backbone of actions while allowing recoverable detours. This perspective makes trajectory compatibility the central criterion for reference selection in multi-turn OPD. Experiments on ALFWorld and the airline domain of $τ^3$-bench show that LCS is the only evaluated reference selector to improve over reference-free OPD on both ALFWorld overall scores and all three airline metrics. Without further optimization, the airline-trained models also transfer to the retail domain, where LCS improves all three metrics.

cs.LG · cs.AI · cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.06380

Does Context Compression Preserve Refusal Alignment?

Anthony Nguyen, Wenjun Lin

原文摘要

Context compression reduces inference cost by encoding inputs into compact representations while preserving semantic content. An open question is whether semantic preservation alone is sufficient to maintain downstream behaviours such as refusal alignment. We investigate this question and find that encoder-based compression systematically weakens refusal behaviour in instruction-tuned language models, despite high reconstruction fidelity. This effect persists across model families and compression architectures. Mechanistic analysis shows that compression attenuates activation along the decoder's learned refusal direction. We further explore Memory Steering, a lightweight inference-time intervention that restores refusal rates to near-baseline levels without retraining and operates entirely in compressed representation space. These results demonstrate that semantic preservation does not guarantee behavioural preservation under compression, highlighting the need to explicitly preserve alignment-relevant features in compression-aware systems.

cs.AI · cs.CL

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1667ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

LeCoDe: A Benchmark Dataset for Interactive Legal Consultation Dialogue Evaluation

Weikang Yuan, Kaisong Song, Zhuoren Jiang Zhejiang University, Junjie Cao, Yujie Zhang, Jun Lin, Kun Kuang Zhejiang University, Ji Zhang Alibaba Group 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Legal consultation is essential for safeguarding individual rights and ensuring access to justice, yet remains costly and inaccessible to many individuals due to the shortage of professionals. While recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising path toward scalable, low-cost legal assistance, current systems fall short in handling the interactive and knowledge-intensive nature of real-world consultations. To address these challenges, we introduce LeCoDe, a multi-turn benchmark dataset constructed from publicly available real-world legal consultation content and carefully processed into a de-identified, structured research resource for evaluating and advancing research on LLMs in legal consultation settings. LeCoDe contains 3,696 multi-turn consultation cases with 110,008 dialogue turns. The dataset is further enriched through expert annotation, including key facts, fact importance, and advice summaries. Furthermore, we propose a comprehensive evaluation framework that assesses LLMs’ consultation capabilities in terms of (1) clarification capability and (2) professional advice quality. This unified framework incorporates 12 metrics across two dimensions. Through extensive experiments on various general and domain-specific LLMs, our results reveal significant challenges in this task, with even state-of-the-art models like GPT-4 achieving only 35.9% recall for clarification and 59.1% overall score for advice quality, highlighting the complexity of professional consultation scenarios. Based on these findings, we further explore several strategies to enhance LLMs’ legal consultation abilities. Our benchmark contributes to advancing research in legal domain dialogue systems, particularly in simulating more real-world user-expert interactions. The resource is available at https://github.com/PiLab-ZJU/LeCoDe.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表