跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+93新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-16 01:34 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-15 02:23 — 2026-11-16 02:23(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-16 01:34最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-16 01:33(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2508.11682

Re-evaluating Heart Rate Variability Biomarkers for Glucose Sensing: The Impact of Age Normalisation and Subject-Independent Validation

Md Basit Azam, Sarangthem Ibotombi Singh

原文摘要

Heart rate variability (HRV) from electrocardiogram (ECG) signals may indicate glycemic status, but prior studies often combine distinct glucose targets and use validation strategies vulnerable to data leakage. Since HRV declines with age, aging may be confounded with diabetes-related autonomic dysfunction. We tested whether age-dependent HRV normalisation improves glycemic estimation. We analysed ECG features from 43 male patients with type 2 diabetes. Outcomes were glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c; n=29) and fasting blood glucose (FBG; n=38). We used leave-one-subject-out cross-validation, with feature selection and standardisation within each training fold. We compared 20 machine-learning algorithms, six age-adjustment methods, and 20 normalisation parameter combinations. Validation included 500 permutations and bootstrap confidence intervals. Extra Trees regression performed best: R2=0.222 (r=0.476, p=0.009) for HbA1c and R2=0.086 (r=0.344, p=0.034) for FBG. Mean absolute errors were 1.18 percentage points and 2.27 mmol/L, respectively. Permutation testing supported both associations (p=0.002). Contrary to our hypothesis, no age-adjustment method or parameter combination improved performance. Tree ensembles retained positive performance under strict validation, whereas linear models had negative R2 values; neural networks performed poorly. Strict within-fold preprocessing materially changed model performance and revealed potential inflation from conventional validation. Bootstrap 95% confidence intervals were [0.13, 0.82] for HbA1c R2 and [0.10, 0.72] for FBG R2. Although findings support HRV-glycemic associations, performance remains insufficient for standalone clinical use. The study highlights the importance of separating glycemic targets, subject-independent validation, within-fold preprocessing, and comprehensive baselines in non-invasive glycemic monitoring research.

eess.SP · cs.AI · cs.LG