跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2506.11945 · v2

Subjective Experience in AI Systems: What Do AI Researchers and the Public Believe?

首次提交 2025-06-14 00:53
版本更新 2026-11-06 04:23
雷达观测 2026-11-09 10:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Whether AI systems are perceived to have subjective experience has scientific, ethical, and governance implications. Yet little is known about how AI researchers and the public view this possibility. We surveyed 582 AI researchers who published in leading AI venues and 825 nationally representative US adults about the likelihood, identification, and governance of AI systems with subjective experience. We find that both AI researchers and the public think it is unlikely that AI systems have subjective experience now, but believe it is more likely than not they will by century's end. Both groups believe multidisciplinary expertise will be important in identifying AI subjective experience, support developers implementing safeguards now, and agree that, if created, subjectively experiencing AI systems should have moral responsibilities and be held accountable. Both groups also show substantial disagreement on many moral and policy questions. Our results underline the importance of building more detailed, evidence-based understanding of public and expert opinion on this contentious issue.

作者备注:141 pages

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-06 04:23 · 最新观测版本

Subjective Experience in AI Systems: What Do AI Researchers and the Public Believe?

Whether AI systems are perceived to have subjective experience has scientific, ethical, and governance implications. Yet little is known about how AI researchers and the public view this possibility. We surveyed 582 AI researchers who published in leading AI venues and 825 nationally representative US adults about the likelihood, identification, and governance of AI systems with subjective experience. We find that both AI researchers and the public think it is unlikely that AI systems have subjective experience now, but believe it is more likely than not they will by century's end. Both groups believe multidisciplinary expertise will be important in identifying AI subjective experience, support developers implementing safeguards now, and agree that, if created, subjectively experiencing AI systems should have moral responsibilities and be held accountable. Both groups also show substantial disagreement on many moral and policy questions. Our results underline the importance of building more detailed, evidence-based understanding of public and expert opinion on this contentious issue.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗