跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2508.18503 · v4

Minimax Analysis of Estimation Problems in Coherent Imaging

首次提交 2025-08-26 05:17
版本更新 2026-11-04 12:01
雷达观测 2026-11-05 11:10
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Unlike conventional imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging, which are often well described by a linear regression framework, coherent imaging systems follow a significantly more complex model. In these systems, the task is to estimate the unknown image ${\boldsymbol x}_o \in \mathbb{R}^n$ from observations ${\boldsymbol y}_1, \ldots, {\boldsymbol y}_L \in \mathbb{R}^m$ of the form $ {\boldsymbol y}_l = A_l X_o {\boldsymbol w}_l + {\boldsymbol z}_l, l = 1, \ldots, L,$ where $X_o = \mathrm{diag}({\boldsymbol x}_o)$ is an $n \times n$ diagonal matrix, ${\boldsymbol w}_1,\ldots, {\boldsymbol w}_L \stackrel{\text{i.i.d.}}{\sim} \mathcal{N}(0,I_n)$ represent speckle noise, and ${\boldsymbol z}_1, \ldots, {\boldsymbol z}_L \stackrel{\text{i.i.d.}}{\sim} \mathcal{N}(0,σ_z^2 I_m)$ denote additive noise. The matrices $A_1, \ldots, A_L \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$ are known forward operators determined by the imaging system. Here, $m$ can be less than $n$, which makes the linear model ill conditioned, and we collect $L$ measurements of the whole setup and try to quantify the loss. The fundamental limits of conventional imaging systems have been extensively studied through sparse linear regression models. However, the limits of coherent imaging systems remain largely unexplored. The goal of this paper is to close this gap by showing, for the first time in the literature, that the minimax risk of estimating ${\boldsymbol x}_o$ scales as $\frac{\max\{σ_z^4,\, m^2,\, n^2\}\, k \log n}{m^2 n L},$ where the parameter $k$ quantifies the effective complexity of the image class.

作者备注:63 pages. Revised to correct typos. The original arXiv version (Nov 18, 2025) contained all current theoretical results. No AI was used to develop or prove these results; AI assisted only with text editing. During revision, AI was additionally used as a mock reviewer to help verify proof correctness. It identified a few minor issues, which the authors subsequently corrected

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v4 · 2026-11-04 12:01 · 最新观测版本

Minimax Analysis of Estimation Problems in Coherent Imaging

Unlike conventional imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging, which are often well described by a linear regression framework, coherent imaging systems follow a significantly more complex model. In these systems, the task is to estimate the unknown image ${\boldsymbol x}_o \in \mathbb{R}^n$ from observations ${\boldsymbol y}_1, \ldots, {\boldsymbol y}_L \in \mathbb{R}^m$ of the form $ {\boldsymbol y}_l = A_l X_o {\boldsymbol w}_l + {\boldsymbol z}_l, l = 1, \ldots, L,$ where $X_o = \mathrm{diag}({\boldsymbol x}_o)$ is an $n \times n$ diagonal matrix, ${\boldsymbol w}_1,\ldots, {\boldsymbol w}_L \stackrel{\text{i.i.d.}}{\sim} \mathcal{N}(0,I_n)$ represent speckle noise, and ${\boldsymbol z}_1, \ldots, {\boldsymbol z}_L \stackrel{\text{i.i.d.}}{\sim} \mathcal{N}(0,σ_z^2 I_m)$ denote additive noise. The matrices $A_1, \ldots, A_L \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$ are known forward operators determined by the imaging system. Here, $m$ can be less than $n$, which makes the linear model ill conditioned, and we collect $L$ measurements of the whole setup and try to quantify the loss. The fundamental limits of conventional imaging systems have been extensively studied through sparse linear regression models. However, the limits of coherent imaging systems remain largely unexplored. The goal of this paper is to close this gap by showing, for the first time in the literature, that the minimax risk of estimating ${\boldsymbol x}_o$ scales as $\frac{\max\{σ_z^4,\, m^2,\, n^2\}\, k \log n}{m^2 n L},$ where the parameter $k$ quantifies the effective complexity of the image class.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗