跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2509.05956 · v5

Pandora's Knapsack via Simple Policies

首次提交 2025-09-07 15:44
版本更新 2026-11-10 21:46
雷达观测 2026-11-11 13:08
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We introduce Pandora's Knapsack: a hybrid of the classic stochastic knapsack [Dean, Goemans, and Vondr'ak, 2008] and Pandora's box [Weitzman, 1979]. As in stochastic knapsack, items have sizes drawn from known distributions, and items that fit within a knapsack contribute to the total value. As in Pandora, every item $i$ comes in a box that costs $c_i$ to open. What distinguishes our problem is that the size is revealed only after opening the box and paying the cost. A motivating application from contract design is knapsack contracts, where a principal sequentially delegates jobs with stochastic processing times to agents before a deadline, and must pay each agent to incentivize effort, even if the job ends up not completing in time. We study the power of simple decision-making policies to approximate Pandora's Knapsack, along two complexity axes: (i)~knowledge of size distributions, and (ii)~adaptivity. We show that, compared to the classic stochastic knapsack and Pandora's box, policies in our model must be significantly more complex along both axes to be approximately optimal. Conversely, we show that with full distributional information and by allowing adaptive skipping of items, a constant approximation can be recovered. Our analysis reveals an economic quantity, namely ROI (return-on-investment, defined as the jobs' minimum utility over cost), which smoothly characterizes the performance of simple policies. Across a hierarchy of increasingly adaptive policies, we establish tight adaptivity gaps all governed by ROI. To demonstrate the importance of the ROI parameter in characterizing simple policies, we revisit Pandora's box, and show that return-on-investment exactly captures the adaptivity gap in this classic problem as well.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v5 · 2026-11-10 21:46 · 最新观测版本

Pandora's Knapsack via Simple Policies

We introduce Pandora's Knapsack: a hybrid of the classic stochastic knapsack [Dean, Goemans, and Vondr'ak, 2008] and Pandora's box [Weitzman, 1979]. As in stochastic knapsack, items have sizes drawn from known distributions, and items that fit within a knapsack contribute to the total value. As in Pandora, every item $i$ comes in a box that costs $c_i$ to open. What distinguishes our problem is that the size is revealed only after opening the box and paying the cost. A motivating application from contract design is knapsack contracts, where a principal sequentially delegates jobs with stochastic processing times to agents before a deadline, and must pay each agent to incentivize effort, even if the job ends up not completing in time. We study the power of simple decision-making policies to approximate Pandora's Knapsack, along two complexity axes: (i)~knowledge of size distributions, and (ii)~adaptivity. We show that, compared to the classic stochastic knapsack and Pandora's box, policies in our model must be significantly more complex along both axes to be approximately optimal. Conversely, we show that with full distributional information and by allowing adaptive skipping of items, a constant approximation can be recovered. Our analysis reveals an economic quantity, namely ROI (return-on-investment, defined as the jobs' minimum utility over cost), which smoothly characterizes the performance of simple policies. Across a hierarchy of increasingly adaptive policies, we establish tight adaptivity gaps all governed by ROI. To demonstrate the importance of the ROI parameter in characterizing simple policies, we revisit Pandora's box, and show that return-on-investment exactly captures the adaptivity gap in this classic problem as well.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗