跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2509.14594 · v3

SynBench: A Benchmark for Differentially Private Text Generation

首次提交 2025-09-18 11:57
版本更新 2026-11-02 13:24
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:42
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Synthetic text generation with Differential Privacy (DP) guarantees emerges as a principled approach that can enable the sharing of sensitive datasets across institutional and regulatory boundaries, while bounding the risks of re-identification and membership inference. LLM-based methods deliver promising results; however, comparisons are exacerbated by differing evaluation setups and "private" datasets, potential pre-training contamination is not considered and guarantees are not verified with DP audits. To advance this field, we introduce a unified evaluation framework with standardised utility and fidelity metrics and privacy audits, encompassing nine curated datasets that capture domain-specific complexities such as technical jargon, long-context dependencies, and specialised document structures. In a large-scale empirical study, we benchmark LLM-based state-of-the-art DP text generators of varying sizes (between 1--8B). Our results indicate that DP synthetic text generation remains an unsolved challenge, with quality deteriorating more as the private datasets deviate further from the generators' pre-training corpora. Our analyses suggest that synthetic data quality may be overestimated when LLMs have been pre-trained---without DP---on portions of the "private" data to be generated, and our membership inference (MIA) auditing setup for synthetic text reveals measurable membership signals even under tight privacy budgets. Finally, we note that under the "public pre-training, private generation" paradigm, the nominal $(\varepsilon,δ)$ guarantee does not account for exposure during pre-training, motivating contamination-aware evaluation of DP synthetic text generation. Code and data splits: https://github.com/ImperialGlobalSingapore/synbench

作者备注:30 pages

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-02 13:24 · 最新观测版本

SynBench: A Benchmark for Differentially Private Text Generation

Synthetic text generation with Differential Privacy (DP) guarantees emerges as a principled approach that can enable the sharing of sensitive datasets across institutional and regulatory boundaries, while bounding the risks of re-identification and membership inference. LLM-based methods deliver promising results; however, comparisons are exacerbated by differing evaluation setups and "private" datasets, potential pre-training contamination is not considered and guarantees are not verified with DP audits. To advance this field, we introduce a unified evaluation framework with standardised utility and fidelity metrics and privacy audits, encompassing nine curated datasets that capture domain-specific complexities such as technical jargon, long-context dependencies, and specialised document structures. In a large-scale empirical study, we benchmark LLM-based state-of-the-art DP text generators of varying sizes (between 1--8B). Our results indicate that DP synthetic text generation remains an unsolved challenge, with quality deteriorating more as the private datasets deviate further from the generators' pre-training corpora. Our analyses suggest that synthetic data quality may be overestimated when LLMs have been pre-trained---without DP---on portions of the "private" data to be generated, and our membership inference (MIA) auditing setup for synthetic text reveals measurable membership signals even under tight privacy budgets. Finally, we note that under the "public pre-training, private generation" paradigm, the nominal $(\varepsilon,δ)$ guarantee does not account for exposure during pre-training, motivating contamination-aware evaluation of DP synthetic text generation. Code and data splits: https://github.com/ImperialGlobalSingapore/synbench

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗