跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2510.05107 · v6

Structured Cognitive Loop for Behavioral Intelligence in Large Language Model Agents (Extended Revision: From Behavioral Architecture to Epistemic Accountability)

首次提交 2025-09-24 01:43
版本更新 2026-11-10 21:25
雷达观测 2026-11-11 13:08
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

The central challenge for AI agents is not performance but accountability. An agent that produces correct outputs through an opaque process offers no basis for verifying why a decision was permitted, attributing errors to identifiable causes, or delegating authority with justified confidence. We introduce the Structured Cognitive Loop (SCL), an architecture that separates cognition, control, action, and memory: the language model proposes, a lightweight controller mediates every proposal before action, and memory is kept externally as a structured store of verified facts. Against ReAct and common LangChain agents on three tasks under matched models, tools, and decoding, SCL achieves 86.3% task success versus 70.5-76.8% across 360 episodes, with higher goal fidelity, fewer redundant calls, more reliable reuse of intermediate states, and fewer unsupported assertions; ablations show that control and external memory contribute independently. We then situate SCL within a broader accountability architecture comprising context-aware human-in-the-loop control, Pool-Gated Retrieval, and the Horizon-Warrant-Commitment framework, and outline the current direction of development, in which instructions are compiled into programs validated before execution so that execution authority derives from a verified program rather than per-cycle model interpretation. For the kind of accountability it pursues, SCL adopts neither multi-agent consensus as a proxy for truth nor the imitation of human cognition as a design goal: it institutionalizes cognition rather than imitating it.

作者备注:Reformatted; added Sec. 2.5 on consensus and imitation, Sec. 3.10 on the compiled direction of SCL; redrawn figures; expanded references

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v6 · 2026-11-10 21:25 · 最新观测版本

Structured Cognitive Loop for Behavioral Intelligence in Large Language Model Agents (Extended Revision: From Behavioral Architecture to Epistemic Accountability)

The central challenge for AI agents is not performance but accountability. An agent that produces correct outputs through an opaque process offers no basis for verifying why a decision was permitted, attributing errors to identifiable causes, or delegating authority with justified confidence. We introduce the Structured Cognitive Loop (SCL), an architecture that separates cognition, control, action, and memory: the language model proposes, a lightweight controller mediates every proposal before action, and memory is kept externally as a structured store of verified facts. Against ReAct and common LangChain agents on three tasks under matched models, tools, and decoding, SCL achieves 86.3% task success versus 70.5-76.8% across 360 episodes, with higher goal fidelity, fewer redundant calls, more reliable reuse of intermediate states, and fewer unsupported assertions; ablations show that control and external memory contribute independently. We then situate SCL within a broader accountability architecture comprising context-aware human-in-the-loop control, Pool-Gated Retrieval, and the Horizon-Warrant-Commitment framework, and outline the current direction of development, in which instructions are compiled into programs validated before execution so that execution authority derives from a verified program rather than per-cycle model interpretation. For the kind of accountability it pursues, SCL adopts neither multi-agent consensus as a proxy for truth nor the imitation of human cognition as a design goal: it institutionalizes cognition rather than imitating it.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗