← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2511.21622 · v2
On the Origin of Algorithmic Progress in AI: Evidence from Language Model Pre-Training
首次提交 2025-11-27 01:46
版本更新 2026-11-10 18:05
雷达观测 2026-11-11 13:08
摘要
Algorithms have been estimated to increase AI pretraining FLOP efficiency by a factor of 22,000 between 2012 and 2023 (Ho et al., 2024). Running ablation experiments on key innovations from this time period, we are able to account for less than 10x of these gains at small compute scales. Surveying the broader literature, we estimate that additional innovations not included in our ablations also account for less than 10x, yielding less than 100x efficiency gains total in low-compute regimes. This leads us to conduct scaling experiments, which provide evidence that the efficiency gap can be explained by algorithms with scale-dependent efficiency improvements. In particular, we conduct scaling experiments between LSTMs and Transformers, finding evidence for exponent differences in their compute-optimal scaling law while finding little scaling difference for many other innovations. These experiments demonstrate that, contrary to standard assumptions, an algorithm's efficiency gains are tied to compute scale. Using experimental scaling extrapolations and literature estimates, we can account for the majority of efficiency gains over the same time period. Our results indicate that algorithmic progress at smaller training compute levels has been far slower than previously assumed, and that measures of algorithmic efficiency are strongly reference-dependent.
作者备注：Accepted at NeurIPS 2026 (camera-ready version)
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v2 · 2026-11-10 18:05 · 最新观测版本
On the Origin of Algorithmic Progress in AI: Evidence from Language Model Pre-Training
Algorithms have been estimated to increase AI pretraining FLOP efficiency by a factor of 22,000 between 2012 and 2023 (Ho et al., 2024). Running ablation experiments on key innovations from this time period, we are able to account for less than 10x of these gains at small compute scales. Surveying the broader literature, we estimate that additional innovations not included in our ablations also account for less than 10x, yielding less than 100x efficiency gains total in low-compute regimes. This leads us to conduct scaling experiments, which provide evidence that the efficiency gap can be explained by algorithms with scale-dependent efficiency improvements. In particular, we conduct scaling experiments between LSTMs and Transformers, finding evidence for exponent differences in their compute-optimal scaling law while finding little scaling difference for many other innovations. These experiments demonstrate that, contrary to standard assumptions, an algorithm's efficiency gains are tied to compute scale. Using experimental scaling extrapolations and literature estimates, we can account for the majority of efficiency gains over the same time period. Our results indicate that algorithmic progress at smaller training compute levels has been far slower than previously assumed, and that measures of algorithmic efficiency are strongly reference-dependent.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗