跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2512.23403 · v2

A pumping-like lemma for languages over infinite alphabets

首次提交 2025-12-29 19:49
版本更新 2026-10-28 16:46
雷达观测 2026-10-30 10:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We prove a pumping-like lemma for languages accepted by one-register alternating finite-memory automata over an infinite alphabet. Every sufficiently long accepted word has a nonempty factor in a bounded suffix that can be repeated under successive powers of a single alphabet permutation. The proof analyzes accepting runs backwards, counting register values by their state profiles within the remaining suffix and summarizing values outside it. We derive effective semi-linearity of the sets of accepted word lengths and prove non-closure under reversal, concatenation, and Kleene star. We also show that this pumping lemma cannot be extended to alternating automata with two registers.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-28 16:46 · 最新观测版本

A pumping-like lemma for languages over infinite alphabets

We prove a pumping-like lemma for languages accepted by one-register alternating finite-memory automata over an infinite alphabet. Every sufficiently long accepted word has a nonempty factor in a bounded suffix that can be repeated under successive powers of a single alphabet permutation. The proof analyzes accepting runs backwards, counting register values by their state profiles within the remaining suffix and summarizing values outside it. We derive effective semi-linearity of the sets of accepted word lengths and prove non-closure under reversal, concatenation, and Kleene star. We also show that this pumping lemma cannot be extended to alternating automata with two registers.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗