跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2601.07342 · v2

From Structured Graphs to Unstructured Evidence: Agentic Root Cause Analysis on Digital Twins

首次提交 2026-01-12 17:13
版本更新 2026-11-02 23:37
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:41
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Root cause analysis over telecom and datacenter infrastructures is commonly addressed by methods that consume structured data, from graph traversal and rule-based correlation to probabilistic and learned models. Yet a digital twin of such an infrastructure cannot model everything at a reasonable cost. Operators therefore record much of what changes as unstructured data attached to the graph, where the discriminating evidence often sits. Methods restricted to structured attributes cannot use it. A diagnosis needs a layer that interprets this data. An agentic layer is a natural candidate, since which fragment matters depends on hypotheses that emerge during the investigation. We demonstrate its feasibility with ReAct, the most widely used agentic architecture. A single LLM interprets the descriptions and explores the graph through a typed tool interface exposed via the Model Context Protocol (MCP). On a benchmark of nine synthetic scenarios covering single-node, multi-node and distractor-heavy evidence (360 runs across four LLMs), a frontier-tier model names the root cause and its type on every run. It reaches 96.7% end-to-end diagnostic accuracy, which also requires the exact supporting evidence. A mid-tier model reaches 86.7%. Accuracy drops for every model when the evidence must be combined across several resources.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-02 23:37 · 最新观测版本

From Structured Graphs to Unstructured Evidence: Agentic Root Cause Analysis on Digital Twins

Root cause analysis over telecom and datacenter infrastructures is commonly addressed by methods that consume structured data, from graph traversal and rule-based correlation to probabilistic and learned models. Yet a digital twin of such an infrastructure cannot model everything at a reasonable cost. Operators therefore record much of what changes as unstructured data attached to the graph, where the discriminating evidence often sits. Methods restricted to structured attributes cannot use it. A diagnosis needs a layer that interprets this data. An agentic layer is a natural candidate, since which fragment matters depends on hypotheses that emerge during the investigation. We demonstrate its feasibility with ReAct, the most widely used agentic architecture. A single LLM interprets the descriptions and explores the graph through a typed tool interface exposed via the Model Context Protocol (MCP). On a benchmark of nine synthetic scenarios covering single-node, multi-node and distractor-heavy evidence (360 runs across four LLMs), a frontier-tier model names the root cause and its type on every run. It reaches 96.7% end-to-end diagnostic accuracy, which also requires the exact supporting evidence. A mid-tier model reaches 86.7%. Accuracy drops for every model when the evidence must be combined across several resources.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗