跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2601.12716 · v2

CellularS2-Bench: A Staged, Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Cellular Network Security Reasoning

首次提交 2026-01-19 12:39
版本更新 2026-11-11 04:12
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:12
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Cellular networks are critical infrastructure supporting billions of worldwide users and safety- and mission-critical services. Vulnerabilities in cellular networks can therefore cause service disruption, privacy breaches, and broad societal harm, motivating growing efforts to analyze 3GPP specifications that define required device and operator behavior. However, existing benchmarks for this domain share three systematic deficiencies: they rely on LLM-generated entries without expert verification, they do not require faithful interpretation of normative language, reasoning across cross-referenced clauses, and verifiable conclusions grounded in multimodal evidence such as tables and figures, and they do not evaluate security reasoning over end-to-end protocol behavior. To address these gaps, we present CellularS2-Bench, a staged benchmark. CellularS2-Bench covers core control-plane specifications, processing over 1,866 paragraphs, 22,033 sentences, 424 figures, and 248 tables. It comprises 13,851 questions and instances across three progressive stages, of which 10,269 (74.14%) are newly constructed from 3GPP specifications and 43 real-world vulnerabilities. Beyond newly constructed tasks, CellularS2-Bench integrates and corrects 3,582 (25.86%) instances from 7 prior datasets to broaden task coverage. To establish a reproducible baseline on CellularS2-Bench, we introduce CellularS2-ARI, a unified Adapt-Retrieve-Integrate framework for systematic understanding and specification-driven security analysis of 3GPP specifications. Together, they establish an accessible and reproducible foundation for quantifying progress in specification understanding and security reasoning in cellular network security.

作者备注:Accepted to the 40th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2026), Evaluations and Datasets Track

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-11 04:12 · 最新观测版本

CellularS2-Bench: A Staged, Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Cellular Network Security Reasoning

Cellular networks are critical infrastructure supporting billions of worldwide users and safety- and mission-critical services. Vulnerabilities in cellular networks can therefore cause service disruption, privacy breaches, and broad societal harm, motivating growing efforts to analyze 3GPP specifications that define required device and operator behavior. However, existing benchmarks for this domain share three systematic deficiencies: they rely on LLM-generated entries without expert verification, they do not require faithful interpretation of normative language, reasoning across cross-referenced clauses, and verifiable conclusions grounded in multimodal evidence such as tables and figures, and they do not evaluate security reasoning over end-to-end protocol behavior. To address these gaps, we present CellularS2-Bench, a staged benchmark. CellularS2-Bench covers core control-plane specifications, processing over 1,866 paragraphs, 22,033 sentences, 424 figures, and 248 tables. It comprises 13,851 questions and instances across three progressive stages, of which 10,269 (74.14%) are newly constructed from 3GPP specifications and 43 real-world vulnerabilities. Beyond newly constructed tasks, CellularS2-Bench integrates and corrects 3,582 (25.86%) instances from 7 prior datasets to broaden task coverage. To establish a reproducible baseline on CellularS2-Bench, we introduce CellularS2-ARI, a unified Adapt-Retrieve-Integrate framework for systematic understanding and specification-driven security analysis of 3GPP specifications. Together, they establish an accessible and reproducible foundation for quantifying progress in specification understanding and security reasoning in cellular network security.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗