跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2602.12413 · v2

Soft Contamination Means Benchmarks Test Shallow Generalization

首次提交 2026-02-13 05:12
版本更新 2026-11-07 09:52
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Training on benchmark test items is a classic way to overestimate generalization to unseen problems. Standard decontamination methods miss semantic duplicates (SemDs): training items equivalent in content to a test item, but distant in string space. We call training on such items soft contamination; when the resulting gains extend to held-out items of the same benchmark (but not to related benchmarks), we call the result shallow generalization. We first embed Olmo 3's entire post-training dataset and search it for SemDs of benchmark items; we then finetune Olmo 3 and Qwen models on natural and synthetic semantic duplicates. We find (1) that soft contamination is widespread: the Olmo corpus contains SemDs of 76% of the CodeForces test set and 100% of MBPP's; (2) that finetuning on SemDs of a benchmark raises accuracy on its held-out items by up to 22pp in controlled experiments and 10-11pp at realistic contamination rates, though the effect varies across benchmarks; (3) that the gains from training on SemDs mostly do not transfer to conceptually similar benchmarks, i.e. we find shallow generalization; (4) that finetuning on items with similar embeddings that are not SemDs produces no such gain, indicating that the mechanism is not mere topical similarity; and (5) that at realistic contamination rates, soft contamination can raise held-out performance about as much as exact duplicates (or more). Benchmark gains here are therefore confounded - in a way that standard decontamination does not address.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-07 09:52 · 最新观测版本

Soft Contamination Means Benchmarks Test Shallow Generalization

Training on benchmark test items is a classic way to overestimate generalization to unseen problems. Standard decontamination methods miss semantic duplicates (SemDs): training items equivalent in content to a test item, but distant in string space. We call training on such items soft contamination; when the resulting gains extend to held-out items of the same benchmark (but not to related benchmarks), we call the result shallow generalization. We first embed Olmo 3's entire post-training dataset and search it for SemDs of benchmark items; we then finetune Olmo 3 and Qwen models on natural and synthetic semantic duplicates. We find (1) that soft contamination is widespread: the Olmo corpus contains SemDs of 76% of the CodeForces test set and 100% of MBPP's; (2) that finetuning on SemDs of a benchmark raises accuracy on its held-out items by up to 22pp in controlled experiments and 10-11pp at realistic contamination rates, though the effect varies across benchmarks; (3) that the gains from training on SemDs mostly do not transfer to conceptually similar benchmarks, i.e. we find shallow generalization; (4) that finetuning on items with similar embeddings that are not SemDs produces no such gain, indicating that the mechanism is not mere topical similarity; and (5) that at realistic contamination rates, soft contamination can raise held-out performance about as much as exact duplicates (or more). Benchmark gains here are therefore confounded - in a way that standard decontamination does not address.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗