跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2602.13112 · v2

AdaGrad-Diff: a Corrected Version of the Adaptive Gradient Algorithm for Composite Optimization

首次提交 2026-02-14 01:12
版本更新 2026-10-29 22:59
雷达观测 2026-10-30 13:28
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Vanilla gradient methods are often highly sensitive to the choice of stepsize, which typically requires manual tuning. Adaptive methods alleviate this issue, with AdaGrad being a prominent example. In this work, we first show that, in composite convex optimization, AdaGrad may fail to exploit the Hölder-smoothness of the differentiable term, as its stepsizes may decrease too rapidly, leading to convergence rates arbitrarily close to the nonsmooth $\mathcal O(n^{-1/2})$ rate. Motivated by this limitation, we study AdaGrad-Diff, a block-wise extension of the UniSgd method considered by \cite{rodomanov2024universality}, which accumulates successive gradient differences rather than gradients themselves. In the deterministic Lipschitz-smooth setting, we prove summability of squared gradient differences without assuming bounded iterates, yielding weak convergence to a minimizer in Hilbert spaces. Moreover, we show that, under $ν$-Hölder-smoothness, stepsizes decay no faster than $n^{-(1-ν)/2}$, thereby avoiding AdaGrad's failure mechanism and recovering the standard $\mathcal O(n^{-(1+ν)/2})$ rate. The same approach recovers known stochastic convergence rates under a unified condition covering bounded variance and interpolation. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed method is more robust than AdaGrad in several practically relevant settings.

作者备注:35 pages

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-29 22:59 · 最新观测版本

AdaGrad-Diff: a Corrected Version of the Adaptive Gradient Algorithm for Composite Optimization

Vanilla gradient methods are often highly sensitive to the choice of stepsize, which typically requires manual tuning. Adaptive methods alleviate this issue, with AdaGrad being a prominent example. In this work, we first show that, in composite convex optimization, AdaGrad may fail to exploit the Hölder-smoothness of the differentiable term, as its stepsizes may decrease too rapidly, leading to convergence rates arbitrarily close to the nonsmooth $\mathcal O(n^{-1/2})$ rate. Motivated by this limitation, we study AdaGrad-Diff, a block-wise extension of the UniSgd method considered by \cite{rodomanov2024universality}, which accumulates successive gradient differences rather than gradients themselves. In the deterministic Lipschitz-smooth setting, we prove summability of squared gradient differences without assuming bounded iterates, yielding weak convergence to a minimizer in Hilbert spaces. Moreover, we show that, under $ν$-Hölder-smoothness, stepsizes decay no faster than $n^{-(1-ν)/2}$, thereby avoiding AdaGrad's failure mechanism and recovering the standard $\mathcal O(n^{-(1+ν)/2})$ rate. The same approach recovers known stochastic convergence rates under a unified condition covering bounded variance and interpolation. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed method is more robust than AdaGrad in several practically relevant settings.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗