跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2603.05625 · v2

SHERLOC: Statistical Hypothesis Evaluation and Recovery for Learning Opponent Characteristics

首次提交 2026-03-06 03:32
版本更新 2026-11-09 02:34
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:19
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

When used in automated decision-making systems, machine learning (ML) models are vulnerable to data-manipulation attacks. Some defense mechanisms (e.g., adversarial regularization) directly affect the ML models while others (e.g., anomaly detection) act within the broader system. However, many defenses operate under a predefined threat model that assumes characteristics of the adversary, including their knowledge, capabilities, and objectives, are known and fixed. In practice, these characteristics may be unknown or evolve over time, creating a mismatch between the assumptions of the defender and the true attacker. In this paper, we study a new perspective on adversarial defense: focusing on the attacker, rather than the attack. We present and demonstrate SHERLOC, a framework for adversarial learning forensics -- namely, a detective that learns about the attacker from observed attack(s). We prove that, without additional knowledge, the attacker is non-identifiable --- multiple potential attackers would perform the same observed attack. This reveals an important distinction between reconstructing an attacker's behavior and recovering the attacker that generated it. We demonstrate empirically that SHERLOC is able to reconstruct a hypothesis attacker that is consistent with the observed attacks against various defender models (i.e., generalized least-squares linear regressors, logistic regressors, and polynomial classifiers) across various security-critical domains. Finally, we show that these inferred attackers need not match the ground truth attacker exactly to have downstream utility. Defenses using the SHERLOC-inferred attackers achieve approximately 90-100% of robustness improvement that would be achieved if the defender had access to the ground-truth attacker.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-09 02:34 · 最新观测版本

SHERLOC: Statistical Hypothesis Evaluation and Recovery for Learning Opponent Characteristics

When used in automated decision-making systems, machine learning (ML) models are vulnerable to data-manipulation attacks. Some defense mechanisms (e.g., adversarial regularization) directly affect the ML models while others (e.g., anomaly detection) act within the broader system. However, many defenses operate under a predefined threat model that assumes characteristics of the adversary, including their knowledge, capabilities, and objectives, are known and fixed. In practice, these characteristics may be unknown or evolve over time, creating a mismatch between the assumptions of the defender and the true attacker. In this paper, we study a new perspective on adversarial defense: focusing on the attacker, rather than the attack. We present and demonstrate SHERLOC, a framework for adversarial learning forensics -- namely, a detective that learns about the attacker from observed attack(s). We prove that, without additional knowledge, the attacker is non-identifiable --- multiple potential attackers would perform the same observed attack. This reveals an important distinction between reconstructing an attacker's behavior and recovering the attacker that generated it. We demonstrate empirically that SHERLOC is able to reconstruct a hypothesis attacker that is consistent with the observed attacks against various defender models (i.e., generalized least-squares linear regressors, logistic regressors, and polynomial classifiers) across various security-critical domains. Finally, we show that these inferred attackers need not match the ground truth attacker exactly to have downstream utility. Defenses using the SHERLOC-inferred attackers achieve approximately 90-100% of robustness improvement that would be achieved if the defender had access to the ground-truth attacker.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗