跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2604.11281 · v2

Epistemic Trust as a Mechanism for Ethics Integration: Failure Modes and Design Principles from 70 Moral Imagination Workshops

首次提交 2026-04-13 18:39
版本更新 2026-11-01 19:07
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:43
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Bottom-up responsible innovation initiatives aim to empower technology development teams to engage in ethical reflection, yet such interventions frequently fail to achieve practitioner engagement. This paper proposes epistemic trust -- the degree to which practitioners regard an intervention, its facilitators, and its content as credible -- as a conceptual model linking intervention design to engagement. Drawing on philosophical work on testimony and practice-based qualitative analysis of over 70 moral imagination workshops with engineering teams between 2019 and 2025, we identify five dimensions of epistemic trust (Relevance, Inclusivity, Agency, Authority, and Alignment) and present a typology of 24 failure modes that arise when these dimensions are inadequately addressed. We derive nine design principles for cultivating epistemic trust, grounded in our operationalization of moral imagination through technomoral scenarios and structured deliberation. Our findings contribute to the literature on collaborative socio-technical integration by specifying the conditions of uptake that existing frameworks leave undertheorized.

作者备注:41 pages, 2 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-01 19:07 · 最新观测版本

Epistemic Trust as a Mechanism for Ethics Integration: Failure Modes and Design Principles from 70 Moral Imagination Workshops

Bottom-up responsible innovation initiatives aim to empower technology development teams to engage in ethical reflection, yet such interventions frequently fail to achieve practitioner engagement. This paper proposes epistemic trust -- the degree to which practitioners regard an intervention, its facilitators, and its content as credible -- as a conceptual model linking intervention design to engagement. Drawing on philosophical work on testimony and practice-based qualitative analysis of over 70 moral imagination workshops with engineering teams between 2019 and 2025, we identify five dimensions of epistemic trust (Relevance, Inclusivity, Agency, Authority, and Alignment) and present a typology of 24 failure modes that arise when these dimensions are inadequately addressed. We derive nine design principles for cultivating epistemic trust, grounded in our operationalization of moral imagination through technomoral scenarios and structured deliberation. Our findings contribute to the literature on collaborative socio-technical integration by specifying the conditions of uptake that existing frameworks leave undertheorized.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗