跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2605.05435 · v2

Active Learning for Conditional Generative Compressed Sensing

首次提交 2026-05-07 04:50
版本更新 2026-11-08 11:49
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Generative compressed sensing uses the range of a pretrained generator as a nonlinear model for recovering structured signals from limited measurements. We study a conditional version of this problem for image recovery from subsampled Fourier measurements using prompt-conditioned generative models. Our framework separates two roles of conditioning: the prompt used to design the sampling distribution and the prompt used to define the recovery model. For ReLU and Lipschitz conditional generators, we prove stable recovery bounds showing that prompt-matched Christoffel sampling retains the same Christoffel complexity constant as existing near-optimal generative compressed sensing theory, while prompt mismatch incurs an explicit compatibility penalty. Experiments with Stable Diffusion show that prompts meaningfully reshape Christoffel sampling distributions and influence image recovery. Overall, our results suggest treating prompts as design variables for sensing, approximation, and recovery, opening new directions for the practical use of conditional generative models in compressed sensing, where conditioning, sampling, and optimization must be considered jointly.

作者备注:45 pages, including appendices. Accepted at NeurIPS 2026; camera-ready version

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-08 11:49 · 最新观测版本

Active Learning for Conditional Generative Compressed Sensing

Generative compressed sensing uses the range of a pretrained generator as a nonlinear model for recovering structured signals from limited measurements. We study a conditional version of this problem for image recovery from subsampled Fourier measurements using prompt-conditioned generative models. Our framework separates two roles of conditioning: the prompt used to design the sampling distribution and the prompt used to define the recovery model. For ReLU and Lipschitz conditional generators, we prove stable recovery bounds showing that prompt-matched Christoffel sampling retains the same Christoffel complexity constant as existing near-optimal generative compressed sensing theory, while prompt mismatch incurs an explicit compatibility penalty. Experiments with Stable Diffusion show that prompts meaningfully reshape Christoffel sampling distributions and influence image recovery. Overall, our results suggest treating prompts as design variables for sensing, approximation, and recovery, opening new directions for the practical use of conditional generative models in compressed sensing, where conditioning, sampling, and optimization must be considered jointly.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗